Eclipse Community Forums: UML2 » UML profiles multiplicties

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » UML2 » UML profiles multiplicties

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

UML profiles multiplicties [message #477451]

Tue, 27 May 2008 09:18

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: Frederik.Gailly.ugent.be

Hi,

I have defined a UML profile with different stereotype and between these
stereotypes I have defined several directed associations which also
contain multiplicities. When I now apply this profile on a model. The
eclipse validator sees which assoictions are missing but after I add the
correct association the validator still does not pass.

Frederik

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML profiles multiplicties [message #477464 is a reply to message #477451]

Mon, 02 June 2008 15:04

james bruck

Messages: 1724
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Frederik,

What is the error that the validator is reporting? What exactly is not
passing? Can you explain what the profile looks like and the model element
you are applying it to?

Cheers,
- James.

"Frederik gailly" <Frederik.Gailly@ugent.be> wrote in message
news:g1gjl6$edq$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> I have defined a UML profile with different stereotype and between these
> stereotypes I have defined several directed associations which also
> contain multiplicities. When I now apply this profile on a model. The
> eclipse validator sees which assoictions are missing but after I add the
> correct association the validator still does not pass.
>
> Frederik

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML profiles multiplicties [message #477477 is a reply to message #477464]

Tue, 03 June 2008 12:07

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: Frederik.Gailly.ugent.be

Hi james

Thank you for your reaction but I solved this issue. However I still
have problems evaluating OCL constraint defined in my UML profile. Do
the UML2 tools not support OCL validation?

Kind Regards,
Frederik

James Bruck wrote:
> Hi Frederik,
>
> What is the error that the validator is reporting? What exactly is not
> passing? Can you explain what the profile looks like and the model element
> you are applying it to?
>
> Cheers,
> - James.
>
> "Frederik gailly" <Frederik.Gailly@ugent.be> wrote in message
> news:g1gjl6$edq$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have defined a UML profile with different stereotype and between these
>> stereotypes I have defined several directed associations which also
>> contain multiplicities. When I now apply this profile on a model. The
>> eclipse validator sees which assoictions are missing but after I add the
>> correct association the validator still does not pass.
>>
>> Frederik
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML profiles multiplicties [message #477487 is a reply to message #477477]

Wed, 04 June 2008 13:17

james bruck

Messages: 1724
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Frederik,

The UML2 tools group can better answer what level of OCL validation support
is provided in their component. I've cc'd the question to that newsgroup.

Cheers,
- James.

"Frederik gailly" <Frederik.Gailly@ugent.be> wrote in message
news:g23c68$bh2$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi james
>
> Thank you for your reaction but I solved this issue. However I still have
> problems evaluating OCL constraint defined in my UML profile. Do the UML2
> tools not support OCL validation?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Frederik
>
>
> James Bruck wrote:
>> Hi Frederik,
>>
>> What is the error that the validator is reporting? What exactly is not
>> passing? Can you explain what the profile looks like and the model
>> element you are applying it to?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - James.
>>
>> "Frederik gailly" <Frederik.Gailly@ugent.be> wrote in message
>> news:g1gjl6$edq$1@build.eclipse.org...
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have defined a UML profile with different stereotype and between these
>>> stereotypes I have defined several directed associations which also
>>> contain multiplicities. When I now apply this profile on a model. The
>>> eclipse validator sees which assoictions are missing but after I add the
>>> correct association the validator still does not pass.
>>>
>>> Frederik
>>

Report message to a moderator