Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » Papyrus » XMI for InterfaceRealization
XMI for InterfaceRealization [message #469044] Thu, 08 January 2009 19:03 Go to next message
mauro is currently offline mauroFriend
Messages: 9
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
I noticed that the InterfaceRealization elements are XMI-encoded
in 2 diffrent ways:

Papyrus:
<packagedElement xmi:type="uml:InterfaceRealization" xmi:id=...

uml2tools:
<interfaceRealization xmi:id=...

are both these representations correct?
Re: XMI for InterfaceRealization [message #469048 is a reply to message #469044] Fri, 09 January 2009 16:36 Go to previous message
Kenn Hussey is currently offline Kenn HusseyFriend
Messages: 1620
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Mauro,

The XML element name is (typically) the name of the feature, not the type of
element, so this difference would suggest to me that you're looking at
serializations of two different values... both of which seem correct.

Kenn

"mauro" <mauro@linux.ca> wrote in message
news:gk5int$lpu$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I noticed that the InterfaceRealization elements are XMI-encoded
> in 2 diffrent ways:
>
> Papyrus:
> <packagedElement xmi:type="uml:InterfaceRealization" xmi:id=...
>
> uml2tools:
> <interfaceRealization xmi:id=...
>
> are both these representations correct?
>
>
Re: XMI for InterfaceRealization [message #575517 is a reply to message #469044] Fri, 09 January 2009 16:36 Go to previous message
Kenn Hussey is currently offline Kenn HusseyFriend
Messages: 1620
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Mauro,

The XML element name is (typically) the name of the feature, not the type of
element, so this difference would suggest to me that you're looking at
serializations of two different values... both of which seem correct.

Kenn

"mauro" <mauro@linux.ca> wrote in message
news:gk5int$lpu$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I noticed that the InterfaceRealization elements are XMI-encoded
> in 2 diffrent ways:
>
> Papyrus:
> <packagedElement xmi:type="uml:InterfaceRealization" xmi:id=...
>
> uml2tools:
> <interfaceRealization xmi:id=...
>
> are both these representations correct?
>
>
Previous Topic:XMI for InterfaceRealization
Next Topic:Papyrus plan
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jan 19 19:49:46 GMT 2020

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02106 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top