Home » Eclipse Projects » Remote Application Platform (RAP) » IE vs Firefox performance
|
| Re: IE vs Firefox performance [message #43116 is a reply to message #43076] |
Thu, 23 August 2007 10:12   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rherrmann.innoopract.com
Hi Tiago,
we are aware of this problem and currently working on it. From what we
know it is due to the IE JavaScript implementation. We already gained
some performance improvements (not yet in CVS) but hope to further
improve the situation.
If you have any input on what could improve the JavaScript performance
on IE, feel free to share.
Cheers,
Rüdiger
Tiago wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My team is planing a RAP based solution and one thing I noticed while
> evaluating RAP is that performance is worst on IE (7 in this case). This is
> mostly noticeable with the progressbar widget, where the progress takes a
> lot longer to complete in IE using the exact same code.
> My question is: is this due to IE js implementation or are there any
> optimizations possible.
> This is somewhat important for our solution as our primary target platform
> is Windows/IE7.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tiago
>
>
|
|
| |
| Re: IE vs Firefox performance [message #43775 is a reply to message #43605] |
Wed, 29 August 2007 07:46 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rherrmann.innoopract.com
Roberto,
we currently focus on IE 7 performance. IE 6 will surely benefit
thereof, but at least until 1.0 (due 2007-09-28) we won't have time to
pay special attention on IE 6.
If you want to give it a try, you can check out the latest from CVS. We
checked in the changes yesterday.
Cheers,
Rüdiger
Roberto Sánchez wrote:
> Hi Rüdiger, My application runs well (more or less) in Firefox 2.x and
> IE 7 (A bit faster in Firefox) but in IExplorer 6 goes so slowly that
> It's impossible to work with it.
>
> Are you working to improve IE6 performance or only in IE7 ?
>
> Regards.
> Roberto.
>
> Rüdiger Herrmann escribió:
>> Hi Tiago,
>>
>> we are aware of this problem and currently working on it. From what we
>> know it is due to the IE JavaScript implementation. We already gained
>> some performance improvements (not yet in CVS) but hope to further
>> improve the situation.
>> If you have any input on what could improve the JavaScript performance
>> on IE, feel free to share.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rüdiger
>>
>> Tiago wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My team is planing a RAP based solution and one thing I noticed while
>>> evaluating RAP is that performance is worst on IE (7 in this case).
>>> This is mostly noticeable with the progressbar widget, where the
>>> progress takes a lot longer to complete in IE using the exact same code.
>>> My question is: is this due to IE js implementation or are there any
>>> optimizations possible.
>>> This is somewhat important for our solution as our primary target
>>> platform is Windows/IE7.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Tiago
>>>
|
|
|
| Re: IE vs Firefox performance [message #43838 is a reply to message #43775] |
Wed, 29 August 2007 08:25 |
 Roberto Sanchez
Messages: 82
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Hi Rüdiger, I've updated with CVS latest version and I've found 2 problems:
In IE 7 appears 2 Javascript errors when index.html is loaded, I have a
Login dialog that isn't shown.
Line: 1588
Character: 3
Error: It was espected a variable, string or number (Original message in
Spanish: Se esperaba un identificador, una cadena o un número)
Line: 12808
Character: 9
Error: 'org' is not defined.
In Firefox (under Mac OS) all works fine, there is no errors, but there
is a problem with TreeItems (I don't know if it is related with this,
but yesterday there was no problem), The problem is that the item text
size is too short and It can't be shown correctly, I've tested RAP demo
app and the problem appears here too.
I'll create a bug ASAP.
Regards.
Roberto
Rüdiger Herrmann escribió:
> Roberto,
>
> we currently focus on IE 7 performance. IE 6 will surely benefit
> thereof, but at least until 1.0 (due 2007-09-28) we won't have time to
> pay special attention on IE 6.
> If you want to give it a try, you can check out the latest from CVS. We
> checked in the changes yesterday.
>
> Cheers,
> Rüdiger
>
>
> Roberto Sánchez wrote:
>> Hi Rüdiger, My application runs well (more or less) in Firefox 2.x and
>> IE 7 (A bit faster in Firefox) but in IExplorer 6 goes so slowly that
>> It's impossible to work with it.
>>
>> Are you working to improve IE6 performance or only in IE7 ?
>>
>> Regards.
>> Roberto.
>>
>> Rüdiger Herrmann escribió:
>>> Hi Tiago,
>>>
>>> we are aware of this problem and currently working on it. From what
>>> we know it is due to the IE JavaScript implementation. We already
>>> gained some performance improvements (not yet in CVS) but hope to
>>> further improve the situation.
>>> If you have any input on what could improve the JavaScript
>>> performance on IE, feel free to share.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rüdiger
>>>
>>> Tiago wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> My team is planing a RAP based solution and one thing I noticed
>>>> while evaluating RAP is that performance is worst on IE (7 in this
>>>> case). This is mostly noticeable with the progressbar widget, where
>>>> the progress takes a lot longer to complete in IE using the exact
>>>> same code.
>>>> My question is: is this due to IE js implementation or are there any
>>>> optimizations possible.
>>>> This is somewhat important for our solution as our primary target
>>>> platform is Windows/IE7.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Tiago
>>>>
|
|
|
| Re: IE vs Firefox performance [message #43871 is a reply to message #43838] |
Wed, 29 August 2007 08:50 |
Roberto Sanchez
Messages: 82
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I've created 2 bugs entries:
For javascript problem in IE7:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=201532
For tree item issue: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=201531
Both problems can be reproduced in RAP demo app.
Regards.
Roberto.
Roberto Sánchez escribió:
> Hi Rüdiger, I've updated with CVS latest version and I've found 2 problems:
>
> In IE 7 appears 2 Javascript errors when index.html is loaded, I have a
> Login dialog that isn't shown.
>
> Line: 1588
> Character: 3
> Error: It was espected a variable, string or number (Original message in
> Spanish: Se esperaba un identificador, una cadena o un número)
>
> Line: 12808
> Character: 9
> Error: 'org' is not defined.
>
> In Firefox (under Mac OS) all works fine, there is no errors, but there
> is a problem with TreeItems (I don't know if it is related with this,
> but yesterday there was no problem), The problem is that the item text
> size is too short and It can't be shown correctly, I've tested RAP demo
> app and the problem appears here too.
>
> I'll create a bug ASAP.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Roberto
>
> Rüdiger Herrmann escribió:
>> Roberto,
>>
>> we currently focus on IE 7 performance. IE 6 will surely benefit
>> thereof, but at least until 1.0 (due 2007-09-28) we won't have time to
>> pay special attention on IE 6.
>> If you want to give it a try, you can check out the latest from CVS.
>> We checked in the changes yesterday.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rüdiger
>>
>>
>> Roberto Sánchez wrote:
>>> Hi Rüdiger, My application runs well (more or less) in Firefox 2.x
>>> and IE 7 (A bit faster in Firefox) but in IExplorer 6 goes so slowly
>>> that It's impossible to work with it.
>>>
>>> Are you working to improve IE6 performance or only in IE7 ?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> Roberto.
>>>
>>> Rüdiger Herrmann escribió:
>>>> Hi Tiago,
>>>>
>>>> we are aware of this problem and currently working on it. From what
>>>> we know it is due to the IE JavaScript implementation. We already
>>>> gained some performance improvements (not yet in CVS) but hope to
>>>> further improve the situation.
>>>> If you have any input on what could improve the JavaScript
>>>> performance on IE, feel free to share.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Rüdiger
>>>>
>>>> Tiago wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> My team is planing a RAP based solution and one thing I noticed
>>>>> while evaluating RAP is that performance is worst on IE (7 in this
>>>>> case). This is mostly noticeable with the progressbar widget, where
>>>>> the progress takes a lot longer to complete in IE using the exact
>>>>> same code.
>>>>> My question is: is this due to IE js implementation or are there
>>>>> any optimizations possible.
>>>>> This is somewhat important for our solution as our primary target
>>>>> platform is Windows/IE7.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tiago
>>>>>
|
|
| |
| Re: IE vs Firefox performance [message #52018 is a reply to message #51939] |
Tue, 16 October 2007 18:50 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jkrause.innoopract.com
Performance is much better now with IE7, but there is still room for
improvement. The qooxdoo team is also working on improving performance,
both startup and rendering. But even with a fully optimized RAP and
qooxdoo IE6 will remain a mediocre execution environment for Ajax apps.
Jochen
T.Gau wrote:
> Now, where version 1.0 is out I like to ask whether this performance
> issue under IE6/7 has been solved?
>
> Regards, T.Gau
>
> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>> Roberto,
>>
>> we currently focus on IE 7 performance. IE 6 will surely benefit
>> thereof, but at least until 1.0 (due 2007-09-28) we won't have time to
>> pay special attention on IE 6.
>> If you want to give it a try, you can check out the latest from CVS.
>> We checked in the changes yesterday.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rüdiger
>>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Jun 10 03:41:21 GMT 2023
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02470 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
