|
| Re: [CDO] Development setup [message #421601 is a reply to message #421592] |
Mon, 11 August 2008 11:42   |
|
Hi André,
I'm currently working on a platform independent way to setup everything
but it will take some more time. Until then it would be great if you
could post your description to the Wiki.
Cheers
/Eike
André Dietisheim schrieb:
> Hi Eike
>
> I just went through the development setup and I'm finally up and
> running. I run linux and I therefore had to apply some changes
> (download path, untar instead of unzip for the eclipse sdk). I changed
> the ant-script. Looking through the script I noticed - I use maven for
> some time now - that most of it would have been free-of-charge with
> maven.
> My question: Is there any interest in my changes to the ant-script (I
> did not manage - I did not invest a lot though - to put a switch
> 'untar instead of 'unzip')? Is there any interest in having a maven
> based approach?
>
> Cheers
> André
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [CDO] Development setup [message #421625 is a reply to message #421607] |
Mon, 11 August 2008 18:21 |
|
André Dietisheim schrieb:
> Hi Eike
>
> thanks for the feedback. What I saw looks pretty interesting. I'm
> looking forward to get my hands on it!
> I posted those small modifications to the wiki. I'm not very happy
> with the formatting, but I didn't find any better way to point out
> that it's only related to get things working on linux.
> To make things even easier, I attached a patch to this mail. Feel free
> to attach it to the wiki page (or not... how you dare)
If you attach the patch to a new Bugzilla and indicate the usual
copyright/EPL disclaimer I could commit the patch file to CVS.
Cheers
/Eike
>
> Cheers
> André
>
> Eike Stepper wrote:
>> Hi André,
>>
>> I'm currently working on a platform independent way to setup
>> everything but it will take some more time. Until then it would be
>> great if you could post your description to the Wiki.
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Eike
>>
>>
>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>> Hi Eike
>>>
>>> I just went through the development setup and I'm finally up and
>>> running. I run linux and I therefore had to apply some changes
>>> (download path, untar instead of unzip for the eclipse sdk). I
>>> changed the ant-script. Looking through the script I noticed - I use
>>> maven for some time now - that most of it would have been
>>> free-of-charge with maven.
>>> My question: Is there any interest in my changes to the ant-script
>>> (I did not manage - I did not invest a lot though - to put a switch
>>> 'untar instead of 'unzip')? Is there any interest in having a maven
>>> based approach?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> André
>
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
| Re: [CDO] target platform: CDO-SDK and Net4J missing? [message #421626 is a reply to message #421608] |
Mon, 11 August 2008 18:25 |
|
André Dietisheim schrieb:
> Hi Eike
>
> one last note:
> I guess you missed (or did I miss something?) to unpack the CDO-SK and
> the Net4J-SDK to the target-platform. I had to add the following to
> the to the "install-target-eclipse"-target:
>
> <unzip dest="${cdo.metadata}"
> src="${downloads.folder}/${baseline.cdo.file}" overwrite="false" />
> <unzip dest="${cdo.metadata}"
> src="${downloads.folder}/${baseline.net4j.file}" overwrite="false" />
>
> Without that my generated pacakges complained about missing cdo-packages.
I don't understand: The two SDKs are not needed in the target platform
since their content (in the latest version) should be checked out into
te workspace via CVS. This is the usual setup but if you want to have
them in the target platform you can also install the SDK in the target
platform manually. Currently I don't see a need to automate this through
the script. Have I missed something?
Cheers
/Eike
>
> Cheers
> André
>
> André Dietisheim wrote:
>> Hi Eike
>>
>> thanks for the feedback. What I saw looks pretty interesting. I'm
>> looking forward to get my hands on it!
>> I posted those small modifications to the wiki. I'm not very happy
>> with the formatting, but I didn't find any better way to point out
>> that it's only related to get things working on linux.
>> To make things even easier, I attached a patch to this mail. Feel
>> free to attach it to the wiki page (or not... how you dare)
>>
>> Cheers
>> André
>>
>> Eike Stepper wrote:
>>> Hi André,
>>>
>>> I'm currently working on a platform independent way to setup
>>> everything but it will take some more time. Until then it would be
>>> great if you could post your description to the Wiki.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Eike
>>>
>>>
>>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>>> Hi Eike
>>>>
>>>> I just went through the development setup and I'm finally up and
>>>> running. I run linux and I therefore had to apply some changes
>>>> (download path, untar instead of unzip for the eclipse sdk). I
>>>> changed the ant-script. Looking through the script I noticed - I
>>>> use maven for some time now - that most of it would have been
>>>> free-of-charge with maven.
>>>> My question: Is there any interest in my changes to the ant-script
>>>> (I did not manage - I did not invest a lot though - to put a switch
>>>> 'untar instead of 'unzip')? Is there any interest in having a maven
>>>> based approach?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> André
>>
>
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
|
| Re: [CDO] target platform: CDO-SDK and Net4J missing? [message #421702 is a reply to message #421701] |
Tue, 12 August 2008 06:46 |
|
André Dietisheim schrieb:
> Hi Eike
>
> Eike Stepper wrote:
>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>> Hi Eike
>>>
>>> one last note:
>>> I guess you missed (or did I miss something?) to unpack the CDO-SK
>>> and the Net4J-SDK to the target-platform. I had to add the following
>>> to the to the "install-target-eclipse"-target:
>>>
>>> <unzip dest="${cdo.metadata}"
>>> src="${downloads.folder}/${baseline.cdo.file}" overwrite="false" />
>>> <unzip dest="${cdo.metadata}"
>>> src="${downloads.folder}/${baseline.net4j.file}" overwrite="false" />
>>>
>>> Without that my generated pacakges complained about missing
>>> cdo-packages.
>> I don't understand: The two SDKs are not needed in the target
>> platform since their content (in the latest version) should be
>> checked out into te workspace via CVS.
>
> you're completely right. I'm sorry! I was (once more) too fast on
> that. Saw a prob, tried to fix it, took the fast track and completely
> forgot to think about it ;-) - I should have thought about it first.
Don't worry, this tends to happen to all of us ;-)
Cheers
/Eike
>
> Cheers
> André
>
> This is the usual setup but if you want to have
>> them in the target platform you can also install the SDK in the
>> target platform manually. Currently I don't see a need to automate
>> this through the script. Have I missed something?
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Eike
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> André
>>>
>>> André Dietisheim wrote:
>>>> Hi Eike
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the feedback. What I saw looks pretty interesting. I'm
>>>> looking forward to get my hands on it!
>>>> I posted those small modifications to the wiki. I'm not very happy
>>>> with the formatting, but I didn't find any better way to point out
>>>> that it's only related to get things working on linux.
>>>> To make things even easier, I attached a patch to this mail. Feel
>>>> free to attach it to the wiki page (or not... how you dare)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> André
>>>>
>>>> Eike Stepper wrote:
>>>>> Hi André,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently working on a platform independent way to setup
>>>>> everything but it will take some more time. Until then it would be
>>>>> great if you could post your description to the Wiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> /Eike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi Eike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just went through the development setup and I'm finally up and
>>>>>> running. I run linux and I therefore had to apply some changes
>>>>>> (download path, untar instead of unzip for the eclipse sdk). I
>>>>>> changed the ant-script. Looking through the script I noticed - I
>>>>>> use maven for some time now - that most of it would have been
>>>>>> free-of-charge with maven.
>>>>>> My question: Is there any interest in my changes to the
>>>>>> ant-script (I did not manage - I did not invest a lot though - to
>>>>>> put a switch 'untar instead of 'unzip')? Is there any interest in
>>>>>> having a maven based approach?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> André
>>>>
>>>
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
| Re: [CDO] Development setup [message #421703 is a reply to message #421625] |
Tue, 12 August 2008 06:48 |
|
Eike Stepper schrieb:
> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>> Hi Eike
>>
>> thanks for the feedback. What I saw looks pretty interesting. I'm
>> looking forward to get my hands on it!
>> I posted those small modifications to the wiki. I'm not very happy
>> with the formatting, but I didn't find any better way to point out
>> that it's only related to get things working on linux.
>> To make things even easier, I attached a patch to this mail. Feel
>> free to attach it to the wiki page (or not... how you dare)
> If you attach the patch to a new Bugzilla and indicate the usual
> copyright/EPL disclaimer I could commit the patch file to CVS.
Btw. I was just told that a disclaimer is not necessary for small
contributions (>= 250 lines).
For larger ones we need review/approval before being allowed to commit them.
>
> Cheers
> /Eike
>
>>
>> Cheers
>> André
>>
>> Eike Stepper wrote:
>>> Hi André,
>>>
>>> I'm currently working on a platform independent way to setup
>>> everything but it will take some more time. Until then it would be
>>> great if you could post your description to the Wiki.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Eike
>>>
>>>
>>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>>> Hi Eike
>>>>
>>>> I just went through the development setup and I'm finally up and
>>>> running. I run linux and I therefore had to apply some changes
>>>> (download path, untar instead of unzip for the eclipse sdk). I
>>>> changed the ant-script. Looking through the script I noticed - I
>>>> use maven for some time now - that most of it would have been
>>>> free-of-charge with maven.
>>>> My question: Is there any interest in my changes to the ant-script
>>>> (I did not manage - I did not invest a lot though - to put a switch
>>>> 'untar instead of 'unzip')? Is there any interest in having a maven
>>>> based approach?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> André
>>
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
|
| Re: [CDO] Development setup [message #421706 is a reply to message #421704] |
Tue, 12 August 2008 07:32 |
|
André Dietisheim schrieb:
> Hi Eike
>
> okiedokie! So I won't open a bugzilla for this, and you'll be able to
> commit my path as-is, right?
No, a Bugzilla is needed this way or that way.
Cheers
/Eike
>
> Cheers
> André
>
> Eike Stepper wrote:
>> Eike Stepper schrieb:
>>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>>> Hi Eike
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the feedback. What I saw looks pretty interesting. I'm
>>>> looking forward to get my hands on it!
>>>> I posted those small modifications to the wiki. I'm not very happy
>>>> with the formatting, but I didn't find any better way to point out
>>>> that it's only related to get things working on linux.
>>>> To make things even easier, I attached a patch to this mail. Feel
>>>> free to attach it to the wiki page (or not... how you dare)
>>> If you attach the patch to a new Bugzilla and indicate the usual
>>> copyright/EPL disclaimer I could commit the patch file to CVS.
>> Btw. I was just told that a disclaimer is not necessary for small
>> contributions (>= 250 lines).
>> For larger ones we need review/approval before being allowed to
>> commit them.
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Eike
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> André
>>>>
>>>> Eike Stepper wrote:
>>>>> Hi André,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently working on a platform independent way to setup
>>>>> everything but it will take some more time. Until then it would be
>>>>> great if you could post your description to the Wiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> /Eike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> André Dietisheim schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi Eike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just went through the development setup and I'm finally up and
>>>>>> running. I run linux and I therefore had to apply some changes
>>>>>> (download path, untar instead of unzip for the eclipse sdk). I
>>>>>> changed the ant-script. Looking through the script I noticed - I
>>>>>> use maven for some time now - that most of it would have been
>>>>>> free-of-charge with maven.
>>>>>> My question: Is there any interest in my changes to the
>>>>>> ant-script (I did not manage - I did not invest a lot though - to
>>>>>> put a switch 'untar instead of 'unzip')? Is there any interest in
>>>>>> having a maven based approach?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> André
>>>>
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03624 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
