|
| Re: Adding a new generation project to genmodel [message #421461 is a reply to message #421459] |
Thu, 07 August 2008 13:32   |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 33133
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Víctor,
Comments below.
Víctor Roldán Betancort wrote:
> Hi Ed and others,
>
> I've been working lately with CDO in one of our projects at Open
> Canarias. Right now I'm trying to develop a CDO-ready editor generator
> instead of using the default CDOEditor, by extending the generated
> editor from an EMF model with the necessary logic to make it
> compatible with CDO. I already made it work by manually modifying an
> EMF generated editor. Next step, generating it!
>
> So what I would like to do now is adding a new generation project kind
> to the genmodel of a CDO-Native model, allowing me to choose it in the
> generation menu of the .genmodel model.
>
> How could this be achieved?
Easier said than done hey...
>
> First of all JET. But there are two alternatives: using the original
> JET included in EMF, or using the new M2T JET project... any clue?
Best to try to reuse what's all there already.
> Which one should I work with?. EMF seems to be still working with it's
> own one.
Yes, we're meaning to move, but with on active developer, that to is
easier said than done.
>
> Secondly, are there any extension points to add new generation project?
Not so much. Probably it's better to try to make the generated editor
project be the CDO editor.
> Which is the way to add this new generation projects to genmodel?
I don't think it's so easy to do this. It's best to use the debugger to
explore how the editor project is currently created and work from
there. Having a look at org.eclipse.emf.examples.generator.validator
will help understand how to generate additional artifacts.
>
> Thanks in advance :)
>
> Victor.
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Adding a new generation project to genmodel [message #421462 is a reply to message #421461] |
Thu, 07 August 2008 14:00 |
Victor Roldan Betancort
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Ed,
thanks for your comments. Good to know what kind of task I'm facing.
I'll try to debug the the generation process.
Cheers!
Victor
Ed Merks escribió:
> Víctor,
>
> Comments below.
>
> Víctor Roldán Betancort wrote:
>> Hi Ed and others,
>>
>> I've been working lately with CDO in one of our projects at Open
>> Canarias. Right now I'm trying to develop a CDO-ready editor generator
>> instead of using the default CDOEditor, by extending the generated
>> editor from an EMF model with the necessary logic to make it
>> compatible with CDO. I already made it work by manually modifying an
>> EMF generated editor. Next step, generating it!
>>
>> So what I would like to do now is adding a new generation project kind
>> to the genmodel of a CDO-Native model, allowing me to choose it in the
>> generation menu of the .genmodel model.
>>
>> How could this be achieved?
> Easier said than done hey...
>>
>> First of all JET. But there are two alternatives: using the original
>> JET included in EMF, or using the new M2T JET project... any clue?
> Best to try to reuse what's all there already.
>> Which one should I work with?. EMF seems to be still working with it's
>> own one.
> Yes, we're meaning to move, but with on active developer, that to is
> easier said than done.
>>
>> Secondly, are there any extension points to add new generation project?
> Not so much. Probably it's better to try to make the generated editor
> project be the CDO editor.
>> Which is the way to add this new generation projects to genmodel?
> I don't think it's so easy to do this. It's best to use the debugger to
> explore how the editor project is currently created and work from
> there. Having a look at org.eclipse.emf.examples.generator.validator
> will help understand how to generate additional artifacts.
>>
>> Thanks in advance :)
>>
>> Victor.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.28628 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
