|
| Re: [EMF Transactions] No custom NotificationFilters? [message #416793 is a reply to message #416765] |
Tue, 19 February 2008 14:40   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com
Hi, Ömer,
The primary use case for these filters was, originally, the declarative
filters on the org.eclipse.emf.transaction.listeners extension point.
Thus, it was desirable to restrict the filters to a set that could be
enumerated in the extension point schema. Another plan was to implement
optimizations such as automatically restructuring composite filters for
efficiency and for sharing equivalent filters (and clauses of composites)
amongst multiple filters.
To my knowledge, none of these intentions have been materialized, yet, so
perhaps it is time to give up the wait and lift this restriction.
Cheers,
Christian
Ömer Yildiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to subclass NotificationFilter to write a specialized filter,
> but its constructor is not public. What's the reason for this restriction?
|
|
|
| Re: [EMF Transactions] No custom NotificationFilters? [message #417938 is a reply to message #416793] |
Sun, 30 March 2008 10:14 |
 Sebastien Moran
Messages: 10
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi Christian,
I am also interested in creating custom NotificationFilters. Is there
any bug/enhancement to vote for ? :)
Thank you.
Regards,
Sebastien.
Christian W. Damus a écrit :
> Hi, Ömer,
>
> The primary use case for these filters was, originally, the declarative
> filters on the org.eclipse.emf.transaction.listeners extension point.
> Thus, it was desirable to restrict the filters to a set that could be
> enumerated in the extension point schema. Another plan was to implement
> optimizations such as automatically restructuring composite filters for
> efficiency and for sharing equivalent filters (and clauses of composites)
> amongst multiple filters.
>
> To my knowledge, none of these intentions have been materialized, yet, so
> perhaps it is time to give up the wait and lift this restriction.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian
>
>
> Ömer Yildiz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to subclass NotificationFilter to write a specialized filter,
>> but its constructor is not public. What's the reason for this restriction?
>
|
|
|
| Re: [EMF Transactions] No custom NotificationFilters? [message #417999 is a reply to message #417938] |
Tue, 01 April 2008 15:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com
Hi Sébastien,
No, there is no such enhancement request currently open.
Cheers,
Christian
Sébastien Moran wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I am also interested in creating custom NotificationFilters. Is there
> any bug/enhancement to vote for ? :)
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sebastien.
-----8<-----
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02910 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
