MDT EODM Termination Review [message #378865] |
Wed, 08 October 2008 18:42  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
The Termination Review for EODM has been declared successful by the EMO
based on the review docuware and community feedback. There was no request
for a Review Call. Thanks.
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #378867 is a reply to message #378865] |
Thu, 16 October 2008 15:31   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Anne Jacko wrote:
> The Termination Review for EODM has been declared successful by the EMO
> based on the review docuware and community feedback.
What's the result of a "successful" review? Termination? Continuation?
Does this have anything to do with the EODM newsgroup disappearing? Is
it archived somewhere?
Where are Termination Reviews announced in case one wants to be informed
of future ones?
Tom
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #378869 is a reply to message #378867] |
Thu, 16 October 2008 18:56   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Tom,
Successful means that the component has been terminated and archived. The
EODM newsgroup archive is available at
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.e odm/maillist.html.
Announcement for all reviews (creation, release, termination, etc.) are sent
out by the EMO a week before the proposed review date to the
eclipse.org-membership-at-large@eclipse.org and
eclipse.org-committers@eclipse.org mailing lists. In the case of EODM, the
component had to be terminated because there was no development team to
carrry it forward. The good news, however, is that a proposal for a new ODM
project at Eclipse is in the works and will be posted in the near future.
Stay tuned.
Kenn
"Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gd7mor$v51$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Anne Jacko wrote:
>> The Termination Review for EODM has been declared successful by the EMO
>> based on the review docuware and community feedback.
>
> What's the result of a "successful" review? Termination? Continuation?
>
> Does this have anything to do with the EODM newsgroup disappearing? Is it
> archived somewhere?
>
> Where are Termination Reviews announced in case one wants to be informed
> of future ones?
>
> Tom
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #378871 is a reply to message #378869] |
Thu, 16 October 2008 20:32   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick reply Kenn.
> The EODM newsgroup archive is available at
> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.e odm/maillist.html.
That would be useful information to include include in the notice.
Additionally, although a closing announcement was posted to the
newsgroup, the group was almost immediately deleted making it unlikely
that it would be seen by anyone who wasn't reading religiously.
> Announcement for all reviews (creation, release, termination, etc.) are sent
> out by the EMO a week before the proposed review date to the
> eclipse.org-membership-at-large@eclipse.org and
> eclipse.org-committers@eclipse.org mailing lists.
OK, so there's no way for interested parties to find out unless they're
Eclipse members. Might I suggest that sending a notice to the newsgroup
might be appropriate?
We actually did look into becoming Associate Members, but since as an
open source organization we depend on the kindness of pro bono lawyers
and the main benefit seems to be co-marketing, we decided not to burn
their valuable time reviewing all the documents associated with
membership. Perhaps we need to revisit that decision if there's
significant communication that's restricted to members lists.
Tom
|
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #378878 is a reply to message #378871] |
Fri, 17 October 2008 00:06   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Tom,
I agree that the information should have been posted with the notice (my
bad); it's also surprisingly difficult to find the newgroup archive, as I
just discovered. I'll work to see if I can make this easier; indeed, the EMO
has done such few terminations that best practices have yet to emerge in
this area.
Unfortunately, a wider broadcast of the intention to terminate EODM would
likely have not made a difference, as the main problem was that there was no
development community to sustain it (despite the apparent interest from the
user community in using it)... I have high hopes that the replacement
component will better serve both communities (in addition to the adopter
community).
Kenn
"Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gd88dn$vnn$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Thanks for the quick reply Kenn.
>
>> The EODM newsgroup archive is available at
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.e odm/maillist.html.
>
> That would be useful information to include include in the notice.
> Additionally, although a closing announcement was posted to the newsgroup,
> the group was almost immediately deleted making it unlikely that it would
> be seen by anyone who wasn't reading religiously.
>
>> Announcement for all reviews (creation, release, termination, etc.) are
>> sent out by the EMO a week before the proposed review date to the
>> eclipse.org-membership-at-large@eclipse.org and
>> eclipse.org-committers@eclipse.org mailing lists.
>
> OK, so there's no way for interested parties to find out unless they're
> Eclipse members. Might I suggest that sending a notice to the newsgroup
> might be appropriate?
>
> We actually did look into becoming Associate Members, but since as an open
> source organization we depend on the kindness of pro bono lawyers and the
> main benefit seems to be co-marketing, we decided not to burn their
> valuable time reviewing all the documents associated with membership.
> Perhaps we need to revisit that decision if there's significant
> communication that's restricted to members lists.
>
> Tom
|
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #593957 is a reply to message #378865] |
Thu, 16 October 2008 15:31  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Anne Jacko wrote:
> The Termination Review for EODM has been declared successful by the EMO
> based on the review docuware and community feedback.
What's the result of a "successful" review? Termination? Continuation?
Does this have anything to do with the EODM newsgroup disappearing? Is
it archived somewhere?
Where are Termination Reviews announced in case one wants to be informed
of future ones?
Tom
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #593976 is a reply to message #378867] |
Thu, 16 October 2008 18:56  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Tom,
Successful means that the component has been terminated and archived. The
EODM newsgroup archive is available at
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.e odm/maillist.html
Announcement for all reviews (creation, release, termination, etc.) are sent
out by the EMO a week before the proposed review date to the
eclipse.org-membership-at-large@eclipse.org and
eclipse.org-committers@eclipse.org mailing lists. In the case of EODM, the
component had to be terminated because there was no development team to
carrry it forward. The good news, however, is that a proposal for a new ODM
project at Eclipse is in the works and will be posted in the near future.
Stay tuned.
Kenn
"Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gd7mor$v51$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Anne Jacko wrote:
>> The Termination Review for EODM has been declared successful by the EMO
>> based on the review docuware and community feedback.
>
> What's the result of a "successful" review? Termination? Continuation?
>
> Does this have anything to do with the EODM newsgroup disappearing? Is it
> archived somewhere?
>
> Where are Termination Reviews announced in case one wants to be informed
> of future ones?
>
> Tom
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #593986 is a reply to message #378869] |
Thu, 16 October 2008 20:32  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick reply Kenn.
> The EODM newsgroup archive is available at
> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.e odm/maillist.html
That would be useful information to include include in the notice.
Additionally, although a closing announcement was posted to the
newsgroup, the group was almost immediately deleted making it unlikely
that it would be seen by anyone who wasn't reading religiously.
> Announcement for all reviews (creation, release, termination, etc.) are sent
> out by the EMO a week before the proposed review date to the
> eclipse.org-membership-at-large@eclipse.org and
> eclipse.org-committers@eclipse.org mailing lists.
OK, so there's no way for interested parties to find out unless they're
Eclipse members. Might I suggest that sending a notice to the newsgroup
might be appropriate?
We actually did look into becoming Associate Members, but since as an
open source organization we depend on the kindness of pro bono lawyers
and the main benefit seems to be co-marketing, we decided not to burn
their valuable time reviewing all the documents associated with
membership. Perhaps we need to revisit that decision if there's
significant communication that's restricted to members lists.
Tom
|
|
|
|
Re: MDT EODM Termination Review [message #594023 is a reply to message #378871] |
Fri, 17 October 2008 00:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Tom,
I agree that the information should have been posted with the notice (my
bad); it's also surprisingly difficult to find the newgroup archive, as I
just discovered. I'll work to see if I can make this easier; indeed, the EMO
has done such few terminations that best practices have yet to emerge in
this area.
Unfortunately, a wider broadcast of the intention to terminate EODM would
likely have not made a difference, as the main problem was that there was no
development community to sustain it (despite the apparent interest from the
user community in using it)... I have high hopes that the replacement
component will better serve both communities (in addition to the adopter
community).
Kenn
"Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gd88dn$vnn$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Thanks for the quick reply Kenn.
>
>> The EODM newsgroup archive is available at
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.e odm/maillist.html
>
> That would be useful information to include include in the notice.
> Additionally, although a closing announcement was posted to the newsgroup,
> the group was almost immediately deleted making it unlikely that it would
> be seen by anyone who wasn't reading religiously.
>
>> Announcement for all reviews (creation, release, termination, etc.) are
>> sent out by the EMO a week before the proposed review date to the
>> eclipse.org-membership-at-large@eclipse.org and
>> eclipse.org-committers@eclipse.org mailing lists.
>
> OK, so there's no way for interested parties to find out unless they're
> Eclipse members. Might I suggest that sending a notice to the newsgroup
> might be appropriate?
>
> We actually did look into becoming Associate Members, but since as an open
> source organization we depend on the kindness of pro bono lawyers and the
> main benefit seems to be co-marketing, we decided not to burn their
> valuable time reviewing all the documents associated with membership.
> Perhaps we need to revisit that decision if there's significant
> communication that's restricted to members lists.
>
> Tom
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04569 seconds