Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » EPF » set a default for the collapsed state of relationships
set a default for the collapsed state of relationships [message #38516] Fri, 24 August 2007 09:18 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: echchad.gmx.de

Hi Everybody
I just detected a new feature in the EPF 1.2 Version:"Process Usage"
The Benefit is that you are able to the processes in which for example
Work Product appear but the disadvantage is that for widely used Work
Products this row grows fat and moves down the some information defined in
the "main description" to the far away bottom of the table.
It would be nice if we could re-arrange the sequence of "relationships"
and "main description" or set a default for the collapse-state (i.e.
releationships are closed/collapsed), so just appears as one line.
Is this possible, I didn't find a function in EPF yet that supports this.
I try to avoid a solution like to put the info of the "main description "
into the purpose box because it is reserved to answer the questions "Why
do we need this? What does it help?"
Does anyone have a solution here?
Thank you in advance!
Best Regards
Abdelilah Echchad
Re: set a default for the collapsed state of relationships [message #38582 is a reply to message #38516] Mon, 27 August 2007 06:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
danny foncke is currently offline danny fonckeFriend
Messages: 92
Registered: July 2009
Member
Yep - I have the same problem - relationship section takes up the whole
visible portion of the screen, the user has to scroll down to get to the
main description :(

And a solution : change the js scripts
In <1.2 versions that was the contentpage.js
I yet have to 'implement' it in 1.2 but a quick scan tells me it is
probably in contentpagesection.js I'll have to look

Arguable not the best solution ... since I have to re-do the work with
every new version of epf

Danny

Abdelilah Echchad wrote:
> Hi Everybody
> I just detected a new feature in the EPF 1.2 Version:"Process Usage"
> The Benefit is that you are able to the processes in which for example
> Work Product appear but the disadvantage is that for widely used Work
> Products this row grows fat and moves down the some information defined
> in the "main description" to the far away bottom of the table.
> It would be nice if we could re-arrange the sequence of "relationships"
> and "main description" or set a default for the collapse-state (i.e.
> releationships are closed/collapsed), so just appears as one line.
> Is this possible, I didn't find a function in EPF yet that supports this.
> I try to avoid a solution like to put the info of the "main description
> " into the purpose box because it is reserved to answer the questions
> "Why do we need this? What does it help?"
> Does anyone have a solution here?
> Thank you in advance!
> Best Regards
> Abdelilah Echchad
>
>
>
Re: set a default for the collapsed state of relationships [message #38794 is a reply to message #38516] Wed, 29 August 2007 07:13 Go to previous message
Peter Haumer is currently offline Peter HaumerFriend
Messages: 228
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello Abdelilah.
Setting the collapse state cannot currently easily be done. Would be a good
enhancement, though. I will file that.

To change the order of the sections however, you could change the style
sheets in this plugin folder

\plugins\org.eclipse.epf.library\layout\xsl

Best regards,
Peter.


"Abdelilah Echchad" <echchad@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:a7290ab700ff3a7a65e1665bed3b15e7$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi Everybody
> I just detected a new feature in the EPF 1.2 Version:"Process Usage"
> The Benefit is that you are able to the processes in which for example
> Work Product appear but the disadvantage is that for widely used Work
> Products this row grows fat and moves down the some information defined in
> the "main description" to the far away bottom of the table.
> It would be nice if we could re-arrange the sequence of "relationships"
> and "main description" or set a default for the collapse-state (i.e.
> releationships are closed/collapsed), so just appears as one line.
> Is this possible, I didn't find a function in EPF yet that supports this.
> I try to avoid a solution like to put the info of the "main description "
> into the purpose box because it is reserved to answer the questions "Why
> do we need this? What does it help?"
> Does anyone have a solution here?
> Thank you in advance!
> Best Regards
> Abdelilah Echchad
>
>
>
Re: set a default for the collapsed state of relationships [message #582213 is a reply to message #38516] Mon, 27 August 2007 06:01 Go to previous message
danny foncke is currently offline danny fonckeFriend
Messages: 92
Registered: July 2009
Member
Yep - I have the same problem - relationship section takes up the whole
visible portion of the screen, the user has to scroll down to get to the
main description :(

And a solution : change the js scripts
In <1.2 versions that was the contentpage.js
I yet have to 'implement' it in 1.2 but a quick scan tells me it is
probably in contentpagesection.js I'll have to look

Arguable not the best solution ... since I have to re-do the work with
every new version of epf

Danny

Abdelilah Echchad wrote:
> Hi Everybody
> I just detected a new feature in the EPF 1.2 Version:"Process Usage"
> The Benefit is that you are able to the processes in which for example
> Work Product appear but the disadvantage is that for widely used Work
> Products this row grows fat and moves down the some information defined
> in the "main description" to the far away bottom of the table.
> It would be nice if we could re-arrange the sequence of "relationships"
> and "main description" or set a default for the collapse-state (i.e.
> releationships are closed/collapsed), so just appears as one line.
> Is this possible, I didn't find a function in EPF yet that supports this.
> I try to avoid a solution like to put the info of the "main description
> " into the purpose box because it is reserved to answer the questions
> "Why do we need this? What does it help?"
> Does anyone have a solution here?
> Thank you in advance!
> Best Regards
> Abdelilah Echchad
>
>
>
Re: set a default for the collapsed state of relationships [message #582339 is a reply to message #38516] Wed, 29 August 2007 07:13 Go to previous message
Peter Haumer is currently offline Peter HaumerFriend
Messages: 228
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello Abdelilah.
Setting the collapse state cannot currently easily be done. Would be a good
enhancement, though. I will file that.

To change the order of the sections however, you could change the style
sheets in this plugin folder

\plugins\org.eclipse.epf.library\layout\xsl

Best regards,
Peter.


"Abdelilah Echchad" <echchad@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:a7290ab700ff3a7a65e1665bed3b15e7$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi Everybody
> I just detected a new feature in the EPF 1.2 Version:"Process Usage"
> The Benefit is that you are able to the processes in which for example
> Work Product appear but the disadvantage is that for widely used Work
> Products this row grows fat and moves down the some information defined in
> the "main description" to the far away bottom of the table.
> It would be nice if we could re-arrange the sequence of "relationships"
> and "main description" or set a default for the collapse-state (i.e.
> releationships are closed/collapsed), so just appears as one line.
> Is this possible, I didn't find a function in EPF yet that supports this.
> I try to avoid a solution like to put the info of the "main description "
> into the purpose box because it is reserved to answer the questions "Why
> do we need this? What does it help?"
> Does anyone have a solution here?
> Thank you in advance!
> Best Regards
> Abdelilah Echchad
>
>
>
Previous Topic:[Scrum] Calling All Interested Parties
Next Topic:OpenUP solution looking for a problem
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 25 04:10:53 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04879 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top