| How do you make an untracked change? [message #36887] |
Sat, 10 June 2006 00:32  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.unknown.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C68C03.CB4BA280
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I want to write to some resources without having the =
TransactionalEditingDomain know about it. Or at the very least, without =
marking the resources as dirty. The change is essentially replacing =
proxies with actual EObjects. Is there a way to do so?
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C68C03.CB4BA280
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to write to some resources =
without having=20
the TransactionalEditingDomain know about it. Or at the very =
least,=20
without marking the resources as dirty. The change is essentially=20
replacing proxies with actual EObjects. Is there a way to do=20
so?</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C68C03.CB4BA280--
|
|
|
| Re: How do you make an untracked change? [message #36921 is a reply to message #36887] |
Sat, 10 June 2006 03:59  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com
Hi, Pratik,
Perform your changes with the Transaction.NO_UNDO,
Transaction.NO_NOTIFICATIONS, and Transaction.NO_TRIGGERS options. If you
think that you may need to make these changes when the calling context has
a read-only transaction in progress, then you would also need the
Transaction.UNPROTECTED option (which actually implies NO_UNDO and
NO_TRIGGERS, anyway, in addition to NO_VALIDATION).
If your resource is tracking modifications (as it would do by default if
you are using GMF), then in order to prevent it becoming dirty, you will
actually have to reset its isModified property. The resource listens
"directly" to its contents using a ModificationTrackingAdapter, so you
can't hide your changes from it.
Do not temporarily disable notification on any object while replacing
proxies in its features using eSetNotify(). This would hide changes from
the ModificationTrackingAdapter, but it would also prevent the
TransactionChangeRecorder from finding out about the new objects attached
to the resource set (esp. in the case of containment proxies). The
consequence would be incomplete change tracking in the future when you do
want it.
HTH,
Christian
Pratik Shah wrote:
> I want to write to some resources without having the
TransactionalEditingDomain know about it. Or at the very least, without
marking the resources as dirty. The change is essentially replacing proxies
with actual EObjects. Is there a way to do so?
|
|
|
| Re: How do you make an untracked change? [message #580439 is a reply to message #36887] |
Sat, 10 June 2006 03:59 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com
Hi, Pratik,
Perform your changes with the Transaction.NO_UNDO,
Transaction.NO_NOTIFICATIONS, and Transaction.NO_TRIGGERS options. If you
think that you may need to make these changes when the calling context has
a read-only transaction in progress, then you would also need the
Transaction.UNPROTECTED option (which actually implies NO_UNDO and
NO_TRIGGERS, anyway, in addition to NO_VALIDATION).
If your resource is tracking modifications (as it would do by default if
you are using GMF), then in order to prevent it becoming dirty, you will
actually have to reset its isModified property. The resource listens
"directly" to its contents using a ModificationTrackingAdapter, so you
can't hide your changes from it.
Do not temporarily disable notification on any object while replacing
proxies in its features using eSetNotify(). This would hide changes from
the ModificationTrackingAdapter, but it would also prevent the
TransactionChangeRecorder from finding out about the new objects attached
to the resource set (esp. in the case of containment proxies). The
consequence would be incomplete change tracking in the future when you do
want it.
HTH,
Christian
Pratik Shah wrote:
> I want to write to some resources without having the
TransactionalEditingDomain know about it. Or at the very least, without
marking the resources as dirty. The change is essentially replacing proxies
with actual EObjects. Is there a way to do so?
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01999 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
