Eclipse Community Forums: Model Driven Health Tools » CCDA 2.1 create two realmCode elements

Home » Eclipse Projects » Model Driven Health Tools » CCDA 2.1 create two realmCode elements(When using createContinuityOfCareDocument2() it create duplicate realmCode elemets)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

CCDA 2.1 create two realmCode elements [message #1755977]

Thu, 09 March 2017 18:18

sanj Guna

Messages: 12
Registered: March 2017

Junior Member

I'm having a minor issue when i use
ConsolFactory.eINSTANCE.createContinuityOfCareDocument2().init() . It creates 2 realmCode tags and it caused EET to fail. If i use ConsolFactory.eINSTANCE.createContinuityOfCareDocument().init() it works fine. Do you have any idea on that.

I noticed that Initializer.Util class has getRegistry(object).getInitializers(object.eClass()) where we get USRealmHeader2 and GeneralHeaderConstraints and that is causing to have two realmCode tags. do you think this is a bug or we are using createContinuityOfCareDocument2() wrong.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ClinicalDocument xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="urn:hl7-org:v3" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:hl7-org:v3 infrastructure/cda/CDA_SDTC.xsd">
<realmCode code="US"/>
<realmCode code="US"/>
<typeId root="2.16.840.1.113883.1.3" extension="POCD_HD000040"/>
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.1.2" extension="2015-08-01"/>
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.1.1"/>
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.1.1" extension="2015-08-01"/>
<id root="2.16.840.1.113883.3.1751" extension="20170308142010"/>
...
</ClinicalDocument>

Report message to a moderator

Re: CCDA 2.1 create two realmCode elements [message #1755979 is a reply to message #1755977]

Thu, 09 March 2017 18:54

Dan Brown

Messages: 21
Registered: December 2015

Junior Member

USRH2 inherits from GHC and the realmcode in USRH2 redefines the realmcode in GHC so there should only be one version looked at ever (in this case, the one in USRH2). It very well may be a bug in the way init() is working. Thanks for the heads up I will look into it when I get a chance.

[Updated on: Thu, 09 March 2017 18:55]

Report message to a moderator