|
|
Re: [buckminster-dev] Where can I find buckminster.core 1.1.350.r10332? [message #33504 is a reply to message #33470] |
Wed, 03 June 2009 09:23 |
Torsten Schlabach Messages: 25 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi Thomas!
> Are you mixing the Bucky builder with other, perhaps older,
> Buckminster installs?
Possibly. I got a newly unpacked Workbench, just installed the Galileo
Builder from the URL you mentioned and there you go. Thanks and sorry
for bothering you.
Though what's a bit confusing for me is that the update site only
*shows* me the Galileo Builder in the "Install Software" dialog, though
it contains all the other features I need as well. That might have been
what have made me think I first need to install Buckminster itself and
got and old version.
Build is running now ...
Thanks for the fast answer!
Regards,
Torsten
Thomas Hallgren schrieb:
> Hi Torsten,
> Everything needed by the Bucky builder (including the bundle you refer
> to) is available from this update site:
>
> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/buckminster/tools-3.5/
>
> Are you mixing the Bucky builder with other, perhaps older, Buckminster
> installs?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> Torsten Schlabach wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am trying to follow this:
>>
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Buckminster_Galileo_Builder
>>
>> Unfortunately, I cannot install the Galileo Builder because it
>> requires buckminster.core 1.1.350.r10332 which I cannot find on any
>> update site.
>>
>> Any hints?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Torsten
> _______________________________________________
> buckminster-dev mailing list
> buckminster-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/buckminster-dev
|
|
|
Re: [buckminster-dev] Where can I find buckminster.core 1.1.350.r10332? [message #33538 is a reply to message #33504] |
Wed, 03 June 2009 09:52 |
|
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Though what's a bit confusing for me is that the update site only
> *shows* me the Galileo Builder in the "Install Software" dialog, though
> it contains all the other features I need as well. That might have been
> what have made me think I first need to install Buckminster itself and
> got and old version.
>
That's what you get when trying to simplify things :-)
But I agree, it would be great if you could open up a feature to see what it actually contains during the process of
selecting features.
> Build is running now ...
>
Good, then all is well.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
|
|
|
Re: [buckminster-dev] Where can I find buckminster.core 1.1.350.r10332? [message #33570 is a reply to message #33504] |
Wed, 03 June 2009 09:52 |
|
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Though what's a bit confusing for me is that the update site only
> *shows* me the Galileo Builder in the "Install Software" dialog, though
> it contains all the other features I need as well. That might have been
> what have made me think I first need to install Buckminster itself and
> got and old version.
>
That's what you get when trying to simplify things :-)
But I agree, it would be great if you could open up a feature to see what it actually contains during the process of
selecting features.
> Build is running now ...
>
Good, then all is well.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
|
|
|
Re: [buckminster-dev] Where can I find buckminster.core 1.1.350.r10332? [message #33604 is a reply to message #33538] |
Wed, 03 June 2009 10:09 |
Torsten Schlabach Messages: 25 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi again!
> Good, then all is well.
Sort of ...
Adding child meta-data repository
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/updates/milestones/
org.eclipse.equinox.internal.provisional.p2.core.ProvisionEx ception:
Unable to read repository at
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/updates/milestones/ content.jar.
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed outAdding child
meta-data repository
org.eclipse.equinox.internal.provisional.p2.core.ProvisionEx ception: No
repository found at
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/updates/milestones/ .
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/updates/milestones/
Looks like the m2 repo has a problem right now.
Then later
Unable to find org.eclipse.galileo.feature.group/1.0.0.qualifier since
its repository definition is missing
Just asking another question:
Should the "Galileo Builder" not be called more accurately "Galileo
Packager"? I mean, IIUC, it does not *build* (compile, jar, ...) the
components but it just grabs them from different update sites and
re-packages them, doesn't it? Or do I misunderstand anything here?
Regards,
Torsten
Thomas Hallgren schrieb:
> Torsten Schlabach wrote:
>> Though what's a bit confusing for me is that the update site only
>> *shows* me the Galileo Builder in the "Install Software" dialog,
>> though it contains all the other features I need as well. That might
>> have been what have made me think I first need to install Buckminster
>> itself and got and old version.
>>
> That's what you get when trying to simplify things :-)
>
> But I agree, it would be great if you could open up a feature to see
> what it actually contains during the process of selecting features.
>
>> Build is running now ...
>>
> Good, then all is well.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
> _______________________________________________
> buckminster-dev mailing list
> buckminster-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/buckminster-dev
|
|
|
Re: [buckminster-dev] Where can I find buckminster.core 1.1.350.r10332? [message #33637 is a reply to message #33604] |
Wed, 03 June 2009 11:08 |
|
> Unable to find org.eclipse.galileo.feature.group/1.0.0.qualifier since
> its repository definition is missing
>
You need to run with -brandingContribution Galileo to make the builder understand that the feature contributed by
Galileo itself is incomplete. It's assembled from bundles that are built from source in order to support the old scheme
of providing 'capabilities'. It's a compromise that we had to put in to make life easier for the contributors. I'm not
overly happy about it and it's unlikely that this approach will survive post Galileo.
> Just asking another question:
>
> Should the "Galileo Builder" not be called more accurately "Galileo
> Packager"? I mean, IIUC, it does not *build* (compile, jar, ...) the
> components but it just grabs them from different update sites and
> re-packages them, doesn't it? Or do I misunderstand anything here?
>
The new name (post Galileo) will most likely be the Buckminster Aggregator.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03260 seconds