Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » M2T (model-to-text transformation) » for loop Sequence type mismatch
for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738637] Thu, 21 July 2016 15:06 Go to next message
Tom Galluzzo is currently offline Tom GalluzzoFriend
Messages: 16
Registered: June 2010
Junior Member
I'm having trouble looping over an Integer size in my model. In the for loop below, I try to extract the Integer with a query. The query works fine when I run it in a template alone and it is clearly generating out the correct modeled integer value. However when I attempt to loop over the number modeled (see below), I get an error that the first and last types in the Sequence{} do not match. I don't understand since the query returns an Integer type, doesn't that match the type of the value 1 in the Sequence?

[query public dimensionSize(anArrayDim : ArrayDimension) : Integer = anArrayDim.size /]

[template public cppVariablePrintout(field : Array)]
[for (Sequence{1..field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()})]
	[field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()/]
[/for]
[/template]
Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738641 is a reply to message #1738637] Thu, 21 July 2016 15:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Willink is currently offline Ed WillinkFriend
Messages: 6109
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi

I certainly had similar troubles when I had the org.eclipse.ocl.ecore
project open in my workspace. Acceleo suffers from metamodel
schizophrenia and so thinks it has more than one Integer type. The
workaround is to use let variables to simplify expressions.

Regards

Ed Willink


On 21/07/2016 16:06, Missing name Mising name wrote:
> I'm having trouble looping over an Integer size in my model. In the
> for loop below, I try to extract the Integer with a query. The query
> works fine when I run it in a template alone and it is clearly
> generating out the correct modeled integer value. However when I
> attempt to loop over the number modeled (see below), I get an error
> that the first and last types in the Sequence{} do not match. I don't
> understand since the query returns an Integer type, doesn't that match
> the type of the value 1 in the Sequence?
>
>
> [query public dimensionSize(anArrayDim : ArrayDimension) : Integer =
> anArrayDim.size /]
>
> [template public cppVariablePrintout(field : Array)]
> [for (Sequence{1..field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()})]
> [field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()/]
> [/for]
> [/template]
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738708 is a reply to message #1738641] Fri, 22 July 2016 12:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Laurent Goubet is currently offline Laurent GoubetFriend
Messages: 1858
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

Please copy/paste the exact error you get, along with its stack trace if any.

Please also try and check if you actually get the result you expect from your query call (could be invalid for example) with a printing statement such as this:

[query public dimensionSize(anArrayDim : ArrayDimension) : Integer = anArrayDim.size /]

[template public cppVariablePrintout(field : Array)]
[field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()/]
[for (Sequence{1..field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()})]
	[field.dimensions->first().dimensionSize()/]
[/for]
[/template]


Laurent Goubet
Obeo
Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738738 is a reply to message #1738708] Fri, 22 July 2016 19:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tom Galluzzo is currently offline Tom GalluzzoFriend
Messages: 16
Registered: June 2010
Junior Member
Ed, and Laurent,

Thank you very much for the quick reply. I tried using a let statement as Ed suggested and unfortunately received the same error. Here is the error text:

org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.AcceleoEvaluationException: Unresolved compilation error, expression was null.
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1886)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoForBlock(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:448)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1913)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplate(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:921)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1897)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplateInvocation(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:972)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1936)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoForBlock(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:537)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1913)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoFileBlock(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:431)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1926)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplate(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:921)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1897)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplateInvocation(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:972)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1936)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.internal.evaluation.IterationTemplate.evaluate(IterationTemplate.java:81)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorImpl.evaluateCollectIterator(EvaluationVisitorImpl.java:1968)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorImpl.visitIteratorExp(EvaluationVisitorImpl.java:1818)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorDecorator.visitIteratorExp(EvaluationVisitorDecorator.java:235)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.ecore.impl.IteratorExpImpl.accept(IteratorExpImpl.java:108)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.AbstractEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AbstractEvaluationVisitor.java:242)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorDecorator.visitExpression(EvaluationVisitorDecorator.java:150)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1965)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplate(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:921)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1897)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.internal.evaluation.QueryImpl.evaluate(QueryImpl.java:146)
	at org.eclipse.ocl.ecore.QueryImpl.evaluate(QueryImpl.java:56)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.generation.AcceleoEngine.doEvaluate(AcceleoEngine.java:365)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.generation.AcceleoEngine.evaluate(AcceleoEngine.java:142)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AcceleoService.doGenerateTemplate(AcceleoService.java:984)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AcceleoService.doGenerate(AcceleoService.java:641)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AbstractAcceleoGenerator.generate(AbstractAcceleoGenerator.java:209)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AbstractAcceleoGenerator.generate(AbstractAcceleoGenerator.java:172)
	at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AbstractAcceleoGenerator.doGenerate(AbstractAcceleoGenerator.java:159)
	at messaging.gen.main.Main.doGenerate(Main.java:204)
	at messaging.gen.main.Main.main(Main.java:162)
org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.AcceleoEvaluationException: Invalid loop iteration at line 39 in Module fieldShared for block for. Last recorded value of self was messaging.fields.impl.ArrayImpl@40754382 (name: errorList, interpretation: null) (sizeType: UNSIGNED_BYTE). Problem found while generating the file 'C:\Users\Tom\workspace\iam\shared\src\messaging\messages\ReportErrors.cpp'.
	at fieldShared.cppVariablePrintout(Array)(fieldShared.mtl:39)
	at fieldShared.cppVariablePrintout(Array)(fieldShared.mtl:37)
	at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:0)
	at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:95)
	at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:7)
	at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:5)
	at main.main(System)(main.mtl:0)
	at main.main(System)(main.mtl:0)
	at main.main(System)(main.mtl:20)


Laurent, I also tried simply to generate the text result of the query and indeed I get the expected value. In my test model my "arraySize" equals 6 and in the generated file I see a printed value of "6".

Also the attached image shows what I see in my mtl editor. The associated error problem is "First and last type mismatch: (1..myIntArraySize)"


  • Attachment: Untitled.png
    (Size: 11.02KB, Downloaded 79 times)
Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738744 is a reply to message #1738738] Fri, 22 July 2016 19:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Willink is currently offline Ed WillinkFriend
Messages: 6109
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
HI

Try putting "1" in a let variable too. If your problem is metamodel
schizophrenia, you must use identical types in paired situations. And
make really sure a rebuild has occurred. In the past I found that time
could be wasted debugging a stale compilation.

Regards

Ed Willink


On 22/07/2016 20:12, Tom Galluzzo wrote:
> Ed, and Laurent,
>
> Thank you very much for the quick reply. I tried using a let statement as Ed suggested and unfortunately received the same error. Here is the error text:
>
>
> org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.AcceleoEvaluationException: Unresolved compilation error, expression was null.
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1886)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoForBlock(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:448)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1913)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplate(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:921)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1897)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplateInvocation(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:972)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1936)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoForBlock(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:537)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1913)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoFileBlock(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:431)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1926)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplate(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:921)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1897)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplateInvocation(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:972)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1936)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.internal.evaluation.IterationTemplate.evaluate(IterationTemplate.java:81)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorImpl.evaluateCollectIterator(EvaluationVisitorImpl.java:1968)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorImpl.visitIteratorExp(EvaluationVisitorImpl.java:1818)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorDecorator.visitIteratorExp(EvaluationVisitorDecorator.java:235)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.ecore.impl.IteratorExpImpl.accept(IteratorExpImpl.java:108)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.AbstractEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AbstractEvaluationVisitor.java:242)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.EvaluationVisitorDecorator.visitExpression(EvaluationVisitorDecorator.java:150)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1965)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitAcceleoTemplate(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:921)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.switchExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1897)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.internal.evaluation.AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.visitExpression(AcceleoEvaluationVisitor.java:1049)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.internal.evaluation.QueryImpl.evaluate(QueryImpl.java:146)
> at org.eclipse.ocl.ecore.QueryImpl.evaluate(QueryImpl.java:56)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.generation.AcceleoEngine.doEvaluate(AcceleoEngine.java:365)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.generation.AcceleoEngine.evaluate(AcceleoEngine.java:142)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AcceleoService.doGenerateTemplate(AcceleoService.java:984)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AcceleoService.doGenerate(AcceleoService.java:641)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AbstractAcceleoGenerator.generate(AbstractAcceleoGenerator.java:209)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AbstractAcceleoGenerator.generate(AbstractAcceleoGenerator.java:172)
> at org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.service.AbstractAcceleoGenerator.doGenerate(AbstractAcceleoGenerator.java:159)
> at messaging.gen.main.Main.doGenerate(Main.java:204)
> at messaging.gen.main.Main.main(Main.java:162)
> org.eclipse.acceleo.engine.AcceleoEvaluationException: Invalid loop iteration at line 39 in Module fieldShared for block for. Last recorded value of self was messaging.fields.impl.ArrayImpl@40754382 (name: errorList, interpretation: null) (sizeType: UNSIGNED_BYTE). Problem found while generating the file 'C:\Users\Tom\workspace\iam\shared\src\messaging\messages\ReportErrors.cpp'.
> at fieldShared.cppVariablePrintout(Array)(fieldShared.mtl:39)
> at fieldShared.cppVariablePrintout(Array)(fieldShared.mtl:37)
> at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:0)
> at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:95)
> at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:7)
> at messageCpp.messageCpp(Message)(messageCpp.mtl:5)
> at main.main(System)(main.mtl:0)
> at main.main(System)(main.mtl:0)
> at main.main(System)(main.mtl:20)
>
>
> Laurent, I also tried simply to generate the text result of the query and indeed I get the expected value. In my test model my "arraySize" equals 6 and in the generated file I see a printed value of "6".
>
> Also the attached image shows what I see in my mtl editor. The associated error problem is "First and last type mismatch: (1..myIntArraySize)"
>
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738802 is a reply to message #1738744] Sun, 24 July 2016 21:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tom Galluzzo is currently offline Tom GalluzzoFriend
Messages: 16
Registered: June 2010
Junior Member
Ok I got it working. I actually had two problems. The first was metamodel Schizophrenia within my own metamodel, which defined a class called "Integer". I can see now why that was very bad. The second was that my "arrayDim.size" type was metamodeled as an "Elong" which wasn't compatible with Acceleo "for" loop or "let" statement assignments for some reason. I needed to switch the metamodel of the size to "Int [int]" in my ecore model.

Any idea why casting an Elong to an Integer in acceleo would cause a let or for loop statement not to execute? Just curious for my own learning.

Thank you everyone for your help. Wonderful support group here!

Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738816 is a reply to message #1738802] Mon, 25 July 2016 08:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Laurent Goubet is currently offline Laurent GoubetFriend
Messages: 1858
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Quote:
Ok I got it working. I actually had two problems. The first was metamodel Schizophrenia within my own metamodel, which defined a class called "Integer". I can see now why that was very bad.


Actually, this is a use case that should work in Acceleo if I'm not mistaken.

Quote:

The second was that my "arrayDim.size" type was metamodeled as an "Elong" which wasn't compatible with Acceleo "for" loop or "let" statement assignments for some reason. I needed to switch the metamodel of the size to "Int [int]" in my ecore model.

Any idea why casting an Elong to an Integer in acceleo would cause a let or for loop statement not to execute? Just curious for my own learning.


This is your real issue. EMF will not consider an integer to be compatible with type ELong, so Acceleo won't either. That is due to how "isInstance" checks are implemented in EMF, you can take a look at EClassifier.isInstance(Object) for your information. Basically, for the "ELong" classifier, the only object that will be considered compatible are instances of "java.lang.Long", which integers are not.

Laurent Goubet
Obeo
Re: for loop Sequence type mismatch [message #1738823 is a reply to message #1738816] Mon, 25 July 2016 08:55 Go to previous message
Ed Willink is currently offline Ed WillinkFriend
Messages: 6109
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Laurent

IMHO this is a use case that should work too.

The revised Pivot OCL implementation associates an optional
behavioralType with each DataType, so that e.g. ELong has an Integer
behavioralType. The OCLforUML profile supports configuring this for
arbitrary user types. For DataTypes with an instance class, the known
Java types are mapped to Inreger / Real.

The use of isInstance() for DataTypes is very suspect, so perhaps you
have a bug to fix (or to report against the Classic OCL).

My view of precision in OCL (and OCL-extending tools) is:

a) User types are loaded from model
b) OCL evaluations proceed, using the behavioral type where necessary
resulting in Integer/Real internal working variables
c) OCL results are saved to the model with Integer/Real
validated/converted to fit the model element's type

Regards

Ed Willink

On 25/07/2016 09:07, Laurent Goubet wrote:
> Quote:
>> The second was that my "arrayDim.size" type was metamodeled as an
>> "Elong" which wasn't compatible with Acceleo "for" loop or "let"
>> statement assignments for some reason. I needed to switch the
>> metamodel of the size to "Int [int]" in my ecore model.
>>
>> Any idea why casting an Elong to an Integer in acceleo would cause a
>> let or for loop statement not to execute? Just curious for my own
>> learning.
>
>
> This is your real issue. EMF will not consider an integer to be
> compatible with type ELong, so Acceleo won't either. That is due to
> how "isInstance" checks are implemented in EMF, you can take a look at
> EClassifier.isInstance(Object) for your information. Basically, for
> the "ELong" classifier, the only object that will be considered
> compatible are instances of "java.lang.Long", which integers are not.
>
> Laurent Goubet
> Obeo
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Previous Topic:Operation and parameters code generation queries
Next Topic:How Does Acceleo Know to Regenerate EMTL files?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 13 17:59:42 GMT 2018

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02087 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top