this was not possible in GMF 1.0. It is now possible with GMF 2.0, we
are in the process of migrating to it.
As for the messaging edges connections between pools, feel free to file
a bug so that you can stay in the loop and know when it is fixed.
Regards,
Antoine
Aurélien MOREAU wrote:
> Hi,
> To specify the data flow of my process, I use data object artifacts
> connected to sequence/message connections with associations. But in
> current STP/BPMN model, SequenceEdge and MessagingEdge don't inherite
> from IdentifiableNode (then no association is possible). Could you
> explain me this choice ?
--
Intalio, the Open Source BPMS Company
<a href="http://www.intalio.com">http://www.intalio.com</a>
<a href="http://bpms.intalio.com">Community website</a>]]>2007-07-03T18:15:09-00:00Re: Associations with message/sequence flow
https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/mv/msg/122575/374108/#msg_374108
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com
Hi Aurelien,
this was not possible in GMF 1.0. It is now possible with GMF 2.0, we
are in the process of migrating to it.
As for the messaging edges connections between pools, feel free to file
a bug so that you can stay in the loop and know when it is fixed.
Regards,
Antoine
Aurélien MOREAU wrote:
> Hi,
> To specify the data flow of my process, I use data object artifacts
> connected to sequence/message connections with associations. But in
> current STP/BPMN model, SequenceEdge and MessagingEdge don't inherite
> from IdentifiableNode (then no association is possible). Could you
> explain me this choice ?