[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[stp-pmc] Re: Mangrove proposal
|
Wayne (cc PMC, Mike, Adrian),
I've uploaded the new Mangrove proposal. Please take a look -- thanks.
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/mangrove/
Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Adrian Mos wrote:
Hi Wayne,
with some delay (holidays...), here's the updated version of the
proposal that takes into account your suggestions as agreed to in my
previous email.
<mangrove-proper-proposal2.zip>
Thanks again for your help.
Cheers,
Adrian.
On Dec 21, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Adrian Mos wrote:
Hi Wayne,
thanks a lot for the comments, see my replies inline:
I'm concerned that the scope is not explicit enough. If I'm
reading the proposal correctly, the intent is to take the
intermediate model that's currently part of STP and turn it into
an separate project in its own right; in this context, the
discussion of integrating the various "SOA editors, runtime and
deployment tools" makes sense. However, that bit about the
intermediate model itself is missing from the scope section.
you are right, it is the current Intermediate Model component (in
Eclipse sense) that I propose to turn into a sub-project of its own
(with an extended set of responsibilities). I will make it clearer
in the scope that it's the IM.
Actually... the "description" section sounds like a better
candidate for the scope. Perhaps you can just merge these two
sections.
OK I can merge them if you think it makes a clearer read.
The proposal talks about "proposed components". Are you using
"component" in the Eclipse Development Process sense? i.e. do you
intend to have different sets of commit rights for each component?
Or are these just functional areas?
Just functional areas, it's true that the word component is highly
overloaded. So it's really just "blocks" of stuff. I can call the
section Functional Areas, to make the separation very clear.
I'll make the changes in the next couple of days or so and send the
improved version back to you.
Thanks for the help.
Cheers,
Adrian.