Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The policy should be something that can be addressable and thus managed separate the the relationships that resources may have to the policy so not sure the proposal you have on the table allows for this today

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Paul Trevithick ---07/02/2008 05:33:47 PM---Okay, I’ve created a wiki page [1] describing the proposed changes. We can discuss this on the regular call tomorrow.

From:	Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	07/02/2008 05:33 PM
Subject:	Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals

---

Okay, I’ve created a wiki page [1] describing the proposed changes. We can discuss this on the regular call tomorrow.

-Paul

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/HOWL_Update_1.1.103


On 7/1/08 12:38 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Must be Notes that is doing this

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Paul Trevithick ---07/01/2008 11:32:40 AM---Drat. I checked with 3 people and it worked for all 3, but clearly not you. So I’ll create a wiki page.


From:
Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:
higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
07/01/2008 11:32 AM

Subject:
Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals


---




Drat. I checked with 3 people and it worked for all 3, but clearly not you. So I’ll create a wiki page.


On 7/1/08 12:00 AM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
pics/whatever did not come through

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Paul Trevithick ---06/30/2008 08:45:39 PM---Jim,


From:
Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >

To:
Jim Sermersheim <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> >

Cc:
higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> >

Date:
06/30/2008 08:45 PM

Subject:
[higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals


---




Jim,

Since I wasn’t very clear in my previous email, I’ve created two slides that compare the old and the revised access control PolicyEntity proposals. First, the original proposal:


And here is the revised proposal:


-Paul_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev