[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse-incubator-e4-dev] What I dislike about using EMF for e4...
|
Michael Scharf schrieb:
Ed Merks wrote:
I would also assert that that EObjects really do feel just like DOM.
Yes it does. But as Eric pointed out, there are a already DOM-like
interfaces in eclipse:
org.eclipse.ui.IMemento
org.eclipse.core.runtime.IConfigurationElement
Does the following make sense?
If our workbench uses a model an IConfigurationElement is not needed any
more because you do your contribution using XMI (if we use EMF).
Contributing a ViewPart could could look like this then:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?eclipse version="3.2"?>
<plugin>
<extension
point="org.eclipse.e4.workbench.ui.view">
<workbench:EViewContribution class="my.pack.MyView1Part" id="view.1"
label="A View" icon="bundle-resource://my.plugin/icons/view.png"/>
<workbench:EViewContribution class="my.pack.MyView2Part" id="view.2"
label="A View" icon="bundle-resource://my.plugin/icons/view.png"/>
</extension>
</plugin>
There's no specialized XSD-Tooling, IConfiguration-Element, ... needed
any more. The current XSD is nothing more than the META-Description of
your contribution and so could be replaced by Ecore ;-)
Tom
--
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl leiter softwareentwicklung/CSO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 8/3 A-6020 innsbruck phone ++43 512 935834
