THIS DOCUMENT IS SUPERCEDED BY ROADMAP v2.0
THIS DOCUMENT IS SUPERCEDED BY ROADMAP v2.0
This document captures the inputs to the Eclipse Requirements Council as of this date. The inputs are from three major sources:
The themes were generated by collecting requirements from the above sources and then synthesizing themes from the various inputs.
These are our fundamental principles, which span all of the themes outlined below.
These themes are not in priority order.
This refers to the need for Eclipse to deal with development and deployment on a larger and more complex scale. Increasing complexities arise from large development teams distributed in different locations, large source code bases and fragile build environments that have been developed incrementally over time, the dynamic nature of new source code bases and their interaction with configuration management, and build environments involving many different tools and build rules. For example, static analysis in development environment should be incremental instead of computing the dependencies from scratch every time.
Changes to Eclipse to ease adoption by large development organizations. As the size of a development organization grows, the manner in which an organization as a whole uses Eclipse changes. For example,
Deployment: We need changes to Eclipse to enable deployment of Eclipse based applications across the enterprise. This includes monitoring capabilities, developing models of the components and interactions in the application delivery chain, enhancing support of logging, tracing, and statistical models to enable prompt troubleshooting in a distributed environment, increasing interoperability with enterprise security infrastructure, and report generation. Develop a robust mechanism to ensure that products from different companies that work well separately on an Eclipse package work well together.
Manageability: JMX is rapidly becoming a standard for Java developers who want to incorporate manageability into their applications during development time. The new J2SE 1.5 JDK includes JMX support. Support for JMX design patterns which enable developers to model manageability and drive transformation to JMX MBeans and other management technologies. Additionally, Eclipse support for JMX creation, via wizards, code assist or other tooling, and monitoring would help in automating the management instrumentation process.
Within the Eclipse community, many development projects are defining new development platforms on top of the Eclipse Platform project. Concrete examples include the Web Tools Platform Project and the Test and Performance Platform Tools Project. It is recognized, however, that some function is not strictly required by the base but is important to exist at the base platform level in order to enable other platforms to succeed. Examples include common undo stack functionality, an extensible navigator, improved command framework, etc.
Opening the internal JDT (UI) interfaces would enable tools to seamlessly facilitate and interact with the JDT core and UI layers. Examples are: the parsing and AST functionality for static code analysis within and outside of Eclipse, extensions of the syntax (SQLJ), having control over and re-using the Java editor (SQLJ, protected code blocks, Java editor as one page of a multi-page editor, ...).
Loosening the strong file orientation by providing an abstraction layer of logical objects would allow to extend the proven Eclipse features to tools working on a higher abstraction level. One example would be the Marker and Quick fix capabilities. In this connection a less restrictive structuring of projects would be desirable (some tools would like to structure and group projects in a more hierarchical way).
Instead of plug-in providers each developing their own plumbing to launch, profile, debug, and manage remote agents running on target, the requirement is for Eclipse platform to provide a consistent, uniform plumbing to address this infrastructure need. These capabilities can be leveraged for:
We need a generic control centre - API to configure, setup, connect and monitor any type of target, node or network.
The Eclipse RCP is a Java-based application framework for the desktop. Building on the Eclipse runtime and the modular plug-in story, it is possible to build applications ranging from command line tools to feature-rich applications that take full advantage of SWT's native platform integration and the many other reusable components. This theme includes work:
The Eclipse components need to not only provide the features that advanced users demand, but also be something that most users find simple to use. This theme includes ease-of-use reviews of existing features, and work that helps make Eclipse-based products simple to use for users with widely-varying backgrounds and skill sets. Focus on ease of use through enhanced user documentation, tutorials, white papers, demonstrations, and a wide range of enhancements to the user interface to streamline basic processes and clarify concepts and terminology. For example, BIRT has a goal of making a user productive in 15 minutes.
The original vision of Eclipse was to accelerate the creation of IDEs. Experience with the CDT and COBOL projects have shown that there is still a lot of work to do to make it simpler to create language-specific IDEs. Our vision is to create an environment where a limited number of well-defined extension points for compilers, parsers, debuggers, building, launching, etc. will allow language IDE developers to simplify the process of creating Eclipse-based offerings.
Plug-in providers have a strong need for an abstract development toolkit where a variety of plug-ins (e.g., editor, managed build system, debugger) can be plugged in for all development environments including Java. This is more efficient than integrating each plug-in with each separate development environment. Focus on an abstract development toolkit improves componentization and consistency across development environments, makes each component within the development environment more robust, and adds flexibility to increase the reach of Eclipse to a variety of development environments (e.g., Fortran, COBOL). This opens up 1:1 relationship between add-in component and development environment into a richer m:n relationship.
This support includes the following features:
This theme includes work that grows deeper roots into the various OS-specific communities, spreads Eclipse to additional operating environments, virtual machines, application development and deployment lifecycles, vertical market-specific frameworks and builds bridges to other open source communities. This can be accomplished through additional documentation and more usable documentation, engineering engagements, marketing and an extensive outreach program incorporating trade shows, user groups, and press and analyst relations opportunities.
The plug-in providers noted differences in the behaviour of Eclipse on Windows and Linux. Window systems sometimes differ in things like the exact sequence of events reported for a given action. This kind of inconsistency can result in platform specific code and increased testing requirements. More consistent behavior would ease the burden on plug-in providers. Over 80% of Eclipse downloads are for Windows, followed by ~20% for Linux, and a very small fraction are for operating systems such as the Macintosh, AIX, Solaris, and HP-UX.
Allow existing Swing/AWT applications to work seamlessly inside the SWT (Eclipse) environment. While the ability to make Swing components function within SWT UI’s was made available in Eclipse 3.0, the ability to integrate complete applications requires additional efforts. For true interoperability between Eclipse and other Swing-based development environments, Eclipse also needs to enable an SWT application to run within a Swing environment.
Eclipse should provide basic tools and frameworks for supporting the construction, deployment and management of web service applications. Example tools include: UDDI browser, XSL/T editor, and WSDL tools.
This section contains valuable inputs which were received by the Requirements Council but which are out of scope for this document. Our intent with this document is to focus on common themes for development across the Eclipse projects. These comments, although very helpful, are primarily requirements of the Eclipse projects laid upon their own build infrastructure and also upon the IT infrastructure provided by the Eclipse Foundation.
Improve build processes to enable multiple organizations to build and test for a variety of hardware platforms, operating systems, JVMs, and other virtual machines. Work out a better process for independent contributors to synchronize contributions with the PMCs and core development teams. Today the process for synching with project teams is somewhat ad hoc and does not account for contributions that come in outside of the core build cycles. It’s also difficult for contributors who are working independently of the core development team to get their code contributions built and tested prior to public availability on the eclipse.org web site.
Make Eclipse project roadmaps visible, up-to-date and longer. The Eclipse community needs clearer visibility on what features are coming over a 12 month time horizon. This will allow Eclipse developers to better plan contributions, Eclipse Add-in providers to better determine where to innovate, and Eclipse users to better determine whether their requirements will be satisfied by Eclipse. Today many available roadmaps are out-of-date and provide no more than 3 months of visibility.
When new projects are started in the Eclipse community, guidelines and "cheat sheets" are needed to help those projects during the startup process with regards to required Eclipse Foundation infrastructure and Eclipse community infrastructure. The overall goal of these guidelines is to enable new projects to come online faster and easier, and to reduce the overhead on existing project members to help in this process. The guidelines should include specific actions and how these should be accomplished (for example, who to contact and what information is needed in order to get the required CVS repository up and running). Topics would include:
|John Kellerman||IBM Corporation|
|Derrick Keefe||QNX Software|
|Par Emanuelsson||Ericsson AB|
|Philip Ma||Hewlett-Packard Company|
|Rich Main and
|Add-In Provider Board Representatives|
|John Wiegand||Platform PMC|
|David Williams||Web Tools PMC|
Anurag Gupta (Intel) wrote the first draft of the themes.
Mike Milinkovich (EF) and John Kellerman (IBM) reviewed the draft and provided feedback – their input has been incorporated into a second draft.
The second draft was reviewed by Paul Clenahan (Actuate), John Kellerman (IBM), Anurag Gupta (Intel), Derrick Keefe (QNX), Par Emanuelsson (Ericsson AB), and Philip Ma (HP) and incorporated into a third draft.
The third draft was reviewed at the Eclipse Requirements Council F2F meeting on Nov 30 and that feedback has been incorporated by Anurag Gupta into the fourth draft .