|
|
Re: Setting up additional remotes for GIT repository [message #778460 is a reply to message #778459] |
Thu, 12 January 2012 13:50 |
|
On 2012-01-12 14:14, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> Just to check that I understand your question. Do you want Buckminster
> to configure the local git clone so it has knowledge of more than a
> single remote git repository?
>
> This is not something Buckminster can do at the moment. I can think of a
> lot of things you may want to specify/do with the clone when configuring
> - such as specifying how much history, which branches to fetch, creating
> tracking branches etc.
>
> Don't know if we have any issues logged that covers this. Thomas?
>
No, no issues so please enter one for this. Can't
- thomas
|
|
|
Re: Setting up additional remotes for GIT repository [message #778461 is a reply to message #778460] |
Thu, 12 January 2012 13:53 |
|
Oops. Didn't mean to post with an incomplete last sentence. What I meant
to write was:
Can't make any promises about priority for this since I think the need
for this particular function is limited. An attached functional patch
will of course increase the chance of getting it in significantly :-)
- thomas
On 2012-01-12 14:50, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> On 2012-01-12 14:14, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
>> Just to check that I understand your question. Do you want Buckminster
>> to configure the local git clone so it has knowledge of more than a
>> single remote git repository?
>>
>> This is not something Buckminster can do at the moment. I can think of a
>> lot of things you may want to specify/do with the clone when configuring
>> - such as specifying how much history, which branches to fetch, creating
>> tracking branches etc.
>>
>> Don't know if we have any issues logged that covers this. Thomas?
>>
> No, no issues so please enter one for this. Can't
>
> - thomas
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02855 seconds