Eclipse Community Forums: TMF (Xtext) » Diagnostic vs. Diagnostic...

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » TMF (Xtext) » Diagnostic vs. Diagnostic...

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Diagnostic vs. Diagnostic... [message #663423]

Mon, 04 April 2011 21:00

Henrik Lindberg
Messages: 2426
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi,
I am moving some logic that I executed during validation to be performed
after linking. The way to report errors is quite different when getting
an IDiagnosticsConsumer instead of being able to call the error(...)
methods.

What is the correct way to report errors ("the same way as in the
validator")? I basically want to report errors against EObject features.

The "Diagnostic" accepted by the IDiagnosticConsumer is not the emf
Diagnostic that is used in the validator, and I found sublcasses for
Linking, Syntax, and Exception issues.

Should I just subclass AbstractDiagnostic ?

Regards
- henrik

Report message to a moderator

Re: Diagnostic vs. Diagnostic... [message #663532 is a reply to message #663423]

Tue, 05 April 2011 10:18

Henrik Lindberg
Messages: 2426
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Where is the logic that translates a FeatureBasedDiagnostic into a
node/location in source ?

- henrik

On 4/5/11 3:00 AM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> Hi,
> I am moving some logic that I executed during validation to be performed
> after linking. The way to report errors is quite different when getting
> an IDiagnosticsConsumer instead of being able to call the error(...)
> methods.
>
> What is the correct way to report errors ("the same way as in the
> validator")? I basically want to report errors against EObject features.
>
> The "Diagnostic" accepted by the IDiagnosticConsumer is not the emf
> Diagnostic that is used in the validator, and I found sublcasses for
> Linking, Syntax, and Exception issues.
>
> Should I just subclass AbstractDiagnostic ?
>
> Regards
> - henrik

Report message to a moderator

Re: Diagnostic vs. Diagnostic... [message #663538 is a reply to message #663532]

Tue, 05 April 2011 10:26

Henrik Lindberg
Messages: 2426
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

I can answer myself -
org.eclipse.xtext.validation.DiagnosticConverterImpl

*sigh*
- henrik

On 4/5/11 4:18 PM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> Where is the logic that translates a FeatureBasedDiagnostic into a
> node/location in source ?
>
> - henrik
>
> On 4/5/11 3:00 AM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am moving some logic that I executed during validation to be performed
>> after linking. The way to report errors is quite different when getting
>> an IDiagnosticsConsumer instead of being able to call the error(...)
>> methods.
>>
>> What is the correct way to report errors ("the same way as in the
>> validator")? I basically want to report errors against EObject features.
>>
>> The "Diagnostic" accepted by the IDiagnosticConsumer is not the emf
>> Diagnostic that is used in the validator, and I found sublcasses for
>> Linking, Syntax, and Exception issues.
>>
>> Should I just subclass AbstractDiagnostic ?
>>
>> Regards
>> - henrik
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Diagnostic vs. Diagnostic... [message #663540 is a reply to message #663538]

Tue, 05 April 2011 10:38

Henrik Lindberg
Messages: 2426
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

hm, actually, I can't find that it makes use of the index for the
feature in that logic.
- henrik

On 4/5/11 4:26 PM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> I can answer myself -
> org.eclipse.xtext.validation.DiagnosticConverterImpl
>
> *sigh*
> - henrik
>
> On 4/5/11 4:18 PM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
>> Where is the logic that translates a FeatureBasedDiagnostic into a
>> node/location in source ?
>>
>> - henrik
>>
>> On 4/5/11 3:00 AM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am moving some logic that I executed during validation to be performed
>>> after linking. The way to report errors is quite different when getting
>>> an IDiagnosticsConsumer instead of being able to call the error(...)
>>> methods.
>>>
>>> What is the correct way to report errors ("the same way as in the
>>> validator")? I basically want to report errors against EObject features.
>>>
>>> The "Diagnostic" accepted by the IDiagnosticConsumer is not the emf
>>> Diagnostic that is used in the validator, and I found sublcasses for
>>> Linking, Syntax, and Exception issues.
>>>
>>> Should I just subclass AbstractDiagnostic ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> - henrik
>>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Configuring local and global scope providers at the same time
Next Topic:	CrossLinking

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sun May 19 00:44:13 EDT 2013