> Not that I know of. What advantage would that have given that EMF
> parses the whole resource anyway?
I know current SAX implementations consume a lot of runtime and memory
if they have to handle large attribute values. For instance in X3D,
point coordinates are saved as attribute values. It would be interesting
to see, if the StaX pulling mechanism (and it's implementations) would
handle this better.
> Kristian Sons wrote:
>> has anyone tried to use the StAX interface as alternative to the SAX
>> implementation of XMLHandler?