| supported runtime platforms [message #2422] |
Fri, 20 January 2006 10:56  |
|
Originally posted by: ThomasSchulze.de.ibm.com
In the original proposal the supported runtime platforms were:
- Oracle BPEL Process Manager runtime
- Eclipse Test and Performance Tools Platform (TPTP) 4.0 Choreography
engine (based on BPEL)
Is this list still up to date?
Thomas
|
|
|
|
| Re: supported runtime platforms [message #2482 is a reply to message #2452] |
Wed, 25 January 2006 07:35   |
|
Originally posted by: ThomasSchulze.de.ibm.com
Hi James,
is a decision in May not to late? This would imply the then selected runtime
supports all BPEL issues which the project has implemented. This can
narrow the possible runtimes - in the badest case to 0.
Thomas.
|
|
|
| Re: supported runtime platforms [message #2601 is a reply to message #2482] |
Wed, 01 February 2006 16:36  |
James Moody Messages: 61 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Thomas Schulze wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> is a decision in May not to late? This would imply the then selected runtime
> supports all BPEL issues which the project has implemented. This can
> narrow the possible runtimes - in the badest case to 0.
>
> Thomas.
Hi Thomas,
It's a tough call. Regardless of the available runtime support, we aim
to have full WSBPEL 2.0 compliance in the editor, model and validator;
from that point of view, choosing a reference runtime too early might
mean that this runtime won't pan out according to our timeline. On the
other hand, waiting longer limits our runway to add support for this
runtime. We could certainly make the decision earlier if there appears
to be a clear winner among the available runtimes.
james
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03295 seconds