|[XPDL] MetaModel - XPDL comparison document [message #25622]
||Mon, 09 April 2007 21:25
Originally posted by: steve.egbert.bull.com|
I am begining to write my document detailing my comparisons between the
AgilPro metamodel, and what can be described with XPDL. My approach is going
to be to identify what is needed to import any arbitrary XPDL into the
metamodel, as I think this is the quickest way of assessing the completeness
of the metamodel.
I am also going to start with XPDL 1.0, with Bonita extensions. XPDL 2.0 is
considerably more complex. The schema is almost 4 times as large and has 142
elements that must be accomodated vs 90 in 1.0. If my document is suficient
for our needs, I can then extend it to cover 2.0. I am including the Bonita
extensions because any implementation is expected to have vendor specific
extensions, we must be sure we can accomodate them, and the Bonita
extensions are the ones I know.
I know that some of you want to see what I am coming up with, and I would
like your feedback as I go as to whether what I am producing is useful.
However, I don't really think I should put my document out on the Wiki until
it is done.
Is there someplace I can post my work in progress, so you can review it?
What format is best?
I am currently composing it in Word 97, although I expect to publish it in
pdf when it is done. I could switch my working copy to Open Office, if that
would be more beneficial.
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01755 seconds