Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Web Tools Project (WTP) » WST depends on Visual Editor???
WST depends on Visual Editor??? [message #170725] Tue, 06 June 2006 11:22 Go to next message
Eclipse User
Originally posted by: dserodio.gmail.com

I'm trying the latest Callisto RC, and I noticed that WST depends on
Visual Editor? It doesn't make much sense to me... Is this dependency
intencional?

Thanks,
Daniel Serodio
Re: WST depends on Visual Editor??? [message #170830 is a reply to message #170725] Thu, 08 June 2006 10:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
David Williams is currently offline David Williams
Messages: 696
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:22:31 -0400, Daniel Serodio <dserodio@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm trying the latest Callisto RC, and I noticed that WST depends on
> Visual Editor? It doesn't make much sense to me... Is this dependency
> intencional?
>

This is some "quirk" of update manager. What we actually depend on
is the JEM (Java EMF Model) and it so happens that the Visual Editor
also "includes" it. This bug was a side effect, I believe, where update
manager was "missing" some dependancies, so was, somehow, made to look
a little harder for them, and unfortunately stops at "first one found",
instead of looking for "smallest set".

I _think_ there's a bug on update manager already, but, if you have
the time to check, (and enter one if not) that would be great.
Re: WST depends on Visual Editor??? [message #170937 is a reply to message #170830] Fri, 09 June 2006 09:58 Go to previous message
Eclipse User
Originally posted by: dserodio.gmail.com

David Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:22:31 -0400, Daniel Serodio <dserodio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying the latest Callisto RC, and I noticed that WST depends on
>> Visual Editor? It doesn't make much sense to me... Is this dependency
>> intencional?
>
> This is some "quirk" of update manager. What we actually depend on
> is the JEM (Java EMF Model) and it so happens that the Visual Editor
> also "includes" it. This bug was a side effect, I believe, where update
> manager was "missing" some dependancies, so was, somehow, made to look
> a little harder for them, and unfortunately stops at "first one found",
> instead of looking for "smallest set".
>
> I _think_ there's a bug on update manager already, but, if you have
> the time to check, (and enter one if not) that would be great.

I didn't find any, so I submitted bug 146253.

Thanks,
Daniel Serodio
Previous Topic:Applet loading native library
Next Topic:Auto-Re-Deploy?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Aug 28 21:34:57 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02629 seconds