Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Jubula » Can the search scope of "Show where used" be extended?(The search scope of "Show where used" is dependent of former actions in Jubula and a bit restricted)
Can the search scope of "Show where used" be extended? [message #1066654] Wed, 03 July 2013 11:08 Go to next message
Eric Schellhammer is currently offline Eric Schellhammer
Messages: 6
Registered: July 2013
Junior Member
Hi,

the query "Show where used" on a Test Case scans

  • the currently open project and
  • all Used Projects that have been opened in the Test Case Browser before (by clicking on the triangle); this makes the query history-dependent.

The following locations are excluded:

  • Used Projects that have not been opened recently
  • Test Suites of all Used Projects (whether opened or unopened)
  • Projects in the database that are not used in the current project but may nevertheless reference the Test Case in question.

Is there a way to include the latter three locations in the search as well?
That would make it much easier to find out if a particular Test Case is unused and may be deleted.

Thanks,
ERIC
Re: Can the search scope of "Show where used" be extended? [message #1067264 is a reply to message #1066654] Mon, 08 July 2013 03:17 Go to previous message
Alexandra Schladebeck is currently offline Alexandra Schladebeck
Messages: 1092
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

The "Used Projects that have not been opened recently" appears to be a bug - you could open a ticket for it.

The other two aspects are definitely out of the current scope of the search - there is no way to include that at the moment. I understand that the use case for this is probably written in this thread. You could put an enhancement in to track interest / comments.

HTH,
Alex
Previous Topic:Observation button and mapping buttons disabled
Next Topic:Who created/edited a suite or case
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jul 31 01:24:05 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.20130 seconds