Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Tigerstripe » Navigable associations
Navigable associations [message #14701] Mon, 16 March 2009 15:58 Go to next message
Marc FLAUW is currently offline Marc FLAUW
Messages: 100
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello,

It seems Tigerstripe requires at least one end of an association to be
navigable.

However, when both ends are never read locally, this error does not show
up.
If these wranings are suppressed (@SuppressWarnings("unused")), then the
error then shows up.

Strange.

Best regards,

Marc
Re: Navigable associations [message #14732 is a reply to message #14701] Thu, 19 March 2009 23:58 Go to previous message
Eric Dillon is currently offline Eric Dillon
Messages: 103
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Marc,

Well we didn't want to enforce the need for navigability of the
associations.

Yet I believe we made it so that the dialogs/editors would kind of "gently
force you to have at least one of ends navigable". We found that to be a
nice usability feature.

It seems however that it is a bit confusing, so maybe worth capturing as a
bugzilla.

Thanks,
Eric



On 3/16/09 8:58 AM, in article
700e1b5bd66911677147a32ea98fcd52$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It seems Tigerstripe requires at least one end of an association to be
> navigable.
>
> However, when both ends are never read locally, this error does not show
> up.
> If these wranings are suppressed (@SuppressWarnings("unused")), then the
> error then shows up.
>
> Strange.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
Re: Navigable associations [message #564507 is a reply to message #14701] Thu, 19 March 2009 23:58 Go to previous message
Eric Dillon is currently offline Eric Dillon
Messages: 103
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Marc,

Well we didn't want to enforce the need for navigability of the
associations.

Yet I believe we made it so that the dialogs/editors would kind of "gently
force you to have at least one of ends navigable". We found that to be a
nice usability feature.

It seems however that it is a bit confusing, so maybe worth capturing as a
bugzilla.

Thanks,
Eric



On 3/16/09 8:58 AM, in article
700e1b5bd66911677147a32ea98fcd52$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It seems Tigerstripe requires at least one end of an association to be
> navigable.
>
> However, when both ends are never read locally, this error does not show
> up.
> If these wranings are suppressed (@SuppressWarnings("unused")), then the
> error then shows up.
>
> Strange.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
Previous Topic:Navigable associations
Next Topic:EJB3 (JPA) Generator Plugin for TigerStripe
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 22 00:24:39 GMT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02238 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software