Eclipse Community Forums: M2T (model-to-text transformation)

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » M2T (model-to-text transformation) » MWE and Check language

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

MWE and Check language [message #1052637]

Tue, 30 April 2013 10:33

Dhanya M

Messages: 19
Registered: April 2013

Junior Member

Hi,

I have 2 ecores in my project having the same contexts in it with same namespace. I want to validate based on one of the ecores. I use a check language and write workflow files to validate.

My workflow file:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<workflow>
<component class="org.eclipse.xtend.check.CheckComponent">
<metaModel class="org.eclipse.xtend.typesystem.emf.EmfMetaModel">
<modelFile value="actual path of the ecore"/>
</metaModel>
<emfAllChildrenSlot value="model"/>
<checkFile value="CheckFile"/>
</component>
</workflow>

When i gave a relative path to my ecore, it was not able to find it. When i gave the actual path of the ecore workflow file executed. However it was not reporting any issues as it used to when there was only one ecore.

How can i be sure that it picks the correct ecore and validate?
I suppose it has something to do with same context names and same namespace. How can i resolve this?

Report message to a moderator

Re: MWE and Check language [message #1053474 is a reply to message #1052637]

Mon, 06 May 2013 08:05

Karsten Thoms

Messages: 602
Registered: July 2009
Location: Dortmund, Germany

Senior Member

First, there is no setter "modelFile" in type EmfMetaModel, it must be "metaModelFile".

The relative path should work when it is relative to the classpath root. Otherwise "metaModelFile" must be a URI string.

You can be sure that the right Ecore metamodel is used just by the fact that it can be located through the URI you are passing. If the file does not exist, you will notice an error.

Since your metaModel is local to the CheckComponent defined you can be sure that this EmfMetaModel instance will be another one than if you define a second CheckComponent. Each CheckComponent will use a different execution context.

Regards,
~Karsten

Need professional support for Xtext, Xpand, EMF?
Go to: http://xtext.itemis.com
Twitter : @kthoms
Blog : www.karsten-thoms.de

[Updated on: Mon, 06 May 2013 08:12]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	[Xpand] validation syntax
Next Topic:	M2T with Xtext2 and Xtend2

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jun 25 00:48:16 GMT 2018

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter