|
|
Re: Updated Eclipse Logo and Trademark Guidelines [message #14877 is a reply to message #14820] |
Fri, 04 February 2005 14:25 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ian.REMOVE.eclipse.org
Ed,
We did not do a logo for applications that just use SWT and JFace. We
definitely considered it but there are a number of other components that we
could have also considered, ex. SWT, JFACE, help manager, etc. Our goal was
to keep things simple, have a small set of logos and see how the community
responded.
Ian
"Ed Burnette" <ed.burnette@sas.com> wrote in message
news:ctus8n$e47$1@www.eclipse.org...
> The guideline says: ' The "Built on Eclipse" trademark is used to identify
> a
> product that includes the core Eclipse Platform, specifically the runtime,
> SWT, JFace, and Generic Workbench components.'
>
> Where does a program using only SWT, or just SWT and JFace fall? For
> example
> Azureus and RSSOwl. They don't use the runtime or workbench components,
> but
> the guideline reads like all 4 are required to qualify.
>
> --
> Ed Burnette
> www.eclipsepowered.org
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Updated Eclipse Logo and Trademark Guidelines [message #14961 is a reply to message #14877] |
Wed, 09 February 2005 11:53 |
|
Ian Skerrett schrieb:
> We did not do a logo for applications that just use SWT and JFace. We
> definitely considered it but there are a number of other components that we
> could have also considered, ex. SWT, JFACE, help manager, etc. Our goal was
> to keep things simple, have a small set of logos and see how the community
> responded.
Well, at least SWT should not have slipped through. It would be nice to
have just something little for SWT apps that says something like "Yes,
it's Java, believe me" ;)
Cu, Gunnar
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03471 seconds