Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) » Default Package
Default Package [message #1157] Mon, 16 April 2007 00:43 Go to next message
Mark Howe is currently offline Mark HoweFriend
Messages: 14
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
With Ruby (I assume it's there for the other languages too) there ia always a default package, which
just adds an unnecessary level of indirection. I'd prefer that it wasn't there, any other opinions?

Thanks
Mark
Re: Default Package [message #1184 is a reply to message #1157] Mon, 16 April 2007 07:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Andrey Platov is currently offline Andrey PlatovFriend
Messages: 26
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hi Mark,

Short question: do you wish to avoid default package at API level or
just from end-user experience point of view? My quick and dirty oppinion
that it would be easy to remove default package visually, but it is
reasonable to have it in code for logic unification... Guys, please
share your thoughts and/or correct me.

Kind Regards,
Andrey

Mark Howe wrote:
> With Ruby (I assume it's there for the other languages too) there ia
> always a default package, which just adds an unnecessary level of
> indirection. I'd prefer that it wasn't there, any other opinions?
>
> Thanks
> Mark
Re: Default Package [message #1211 is a reply to message #1184] Mon, 16 April 2007 17:08 Go to previous message
Mark Howe is currently offline Mark HoweFriend
Messages: 14
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hi Andrey, yes just the end-user perspective. The concept seems fine in the API.


Andrey Platov wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Short question: do you wish to avoid default package at API level or
> just from end-user experience point of view? My quick and dirty oppinion
> that it would be easy to remove default package visually, but it is
> reasonable to have it in code for logic unification... Guys, please
> share your thoughts and/or correct me.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Andrey
>
> Mark Howe wrote:
>> With Ruby (I assume it's there for the other languages too) there ia
>> always a default package, which just adds an unnecessary level of
>> indirection. I'd prefer that it wasn't there, any other opinions?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mark
Previous Topic:Creating a project programatically?
Next Topic:javascript functionality available?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Dec 20 10:29:05 GMT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02599 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software