Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » Epsilon » GMF with Epsilon vs MetaEdit+
GMF with Epsilon vs MetaEdit+ [message #1017276] Mon, 11 March 2013 08:43 Go to next message
serhat gezgin is currently offline serhat gezgin
Messages: 236
Registered: January 2013
Location: Izmir
Senior Member
Hi all,

I'm currently working on a research project and i must compare GMF with Epsilon vs MetaEdit+

I have already search some comparison beetween them. And just found MegaEdit+ better

than GMF for Industry. Can't find objective comparison. They all glorify MetaEdit+

So i want to ask u, what kind of differences exists between this 2, what is the The

strengths of the GMF with Epsilon (topics: Graphical, Operations, Constraints).

Best regards,

Serhat GEZG─░N
Re: GMF with Epsilon vs MetaEdit+ [message #1017285 is a reply to message #1017276] Mon, 11 March 2013 09:40 Go to previous message
Steven Kelly is currently offline Steven Kelly
Messages: 3
Registered: April 2012
Junior Member
Hi Serhat,

There's a useful comparison by Eclipse modeling project committers of GMF, RSA, Obeo, GME and MetaEdit+: tinyurl.com/gerard12 . To make the comparison objective rather than just opinions, they implemented the same language in all the tools, giving scores for the results and timing how long it took.

If you're interested in the expressiveness of the metamodeling languages (meta-metamodels), there's also a comparison by Heiko Kern for MetaEdit+ (GOPPRR), GMF (Ecore), ARIS, MS DSL Tools & Visio: www.dsmforum.org/events/DSM11/Papers/kern.pdf

What were the comparisons you already found?

At MODELS2012, Dimitris Kolovos and I had fun between sessions building an Epsilon interface to MetaEdit+, so that might also be an option for you.

All the best,
Steve
Previous Topic:EVL Validation
Next Topic: Nodes with centred content don't work
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jul 26 01:09:54 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03427 seconds