|Re: Current status of QVTd? [message #1006613 is a reply to message #1006608]
||Fri, 01 February 2013 07:39
| Ed Willink
Registered: July 2009
The QVTc and QVTr editors should be usefully functional. The 0.10
editors from the download pages may be slightly better.
The ModelMorf examples had only a couple of errors with the 0.8
IMP-based editors. I must confess that I haven't checked them properly
with the newer Xtext-based editors. I suspect that they just need import
declarations. In 0.8, a Model Registry was required to specify the
meta-model name to location mapping. I eventually decided that this was
a language bug and introduced import, include and library declarations.
Look at the Rel2Core which is what I use mostly for exercising.
My company, Willink Transformations, is sponsoring an EngD student at
York to pursue the progressive transformation approach outlined in
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MMT/QVT_Declarative_Languages. Currently some
very simple QVTi transformations are working. This gives confidence that
the approach is good. The execution work is all Open Source and
currently on GitHub at git://github.com/arcanefoam/qvtMustus. It will
move to Eclipse in a few months.
The goal is basic QVTc execution for Kepler, basic QVTr execution for
Kepler+1, optimized execution for Kepler+2.
The code is all layered on top of the new Xtext-based, UML-aligned pivot
OCL binding, so the new direct OCL to Java code generator can be
exploited to give high quality compiled transformation code.
On 01/02/2013 07:16, Akira Tanaka wrote:
> Hello QVT-Declarative experts,
> I am curious about the current status and future plan of QVT-Declarative.
> I tried the following.
> - Installed eclipse modeling (Juno) package
> - Installed QVT Declarative 0.9.0 using All-In-One Update site [also
> tried other versions but did not work]
> - Installed OCL package using "Install Modeling Components" (to
> utilize ModelRegistry Model Editor)
> - Introduced ModelMorf distribution Examples into the workspace
> I see introduced *.qvtr files have lots of red flags. It seems most of
> them are due to the fact that they are unable to recognize metamodels
> (.emof files -- even modified as ecore files). I am curious to learn
> if there is any way to fix this. If not, is there any plan?
> It seems QVT Declarative is not usable at this moment (if above is not
> fixable). Or, is there any configurations or previous package etc. we
> can use for the time being? Also, with the installation of QVT
> Declarative, it provides (from File -> New menu) creating empty QVTc
> project capability. Is QVTc actually implemented in the same
> Thank you for clarification in advance.
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.42485 seconds