|Blanks in package names after import [message #13406]
||Fri, 30 January 2009 09:52
| Marc FLAUW
Registered: July 2009
Still on the import of the SID from RSM.
The SID is structured in UML packages, that do include blanks.
The top package is "Logical View" , then "Common Business Entities
Domain", then "Problem ABE" in my case.
So in the java classes of Tigerstripe, the package statement becomes:
package Logical View.Common Business Entities Domain.Problem ABE;
This gives tons of errors in Tigerstripe.
This raises a few questions:
1) why the import of Tigerstripe allows blanks in packages as this is
2) the generatd package name "Logical View.Common Business Entities
Domain.Problem ABE" is natural for an Information Model, but seems very
strange at implementation level. It would be more natural to have
something like org.tmforum.interfaces.cbe.problem. I cannot change the
information model, but is there a way to indicate a package mapping to
have a more useful package name?
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.02496 seconds