Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » ORMF » Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation]
Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #12967] Sun, 12 October 2008 09:52 Go to next message
Joel Rosi-Schwartz is currently offline Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Messages: 624
Registered: July 2009
Location: London. England
Senior Member
One of the goals of the ORMF project is to be able to support
recognised requirement management standards. Before plunging into the
task head first, we at ORMF need to identify which standards are of
interest and to have sufficient details on these to analyse the effort
required to support them in terms of both elucidation and reporting. We
are looking for professionals who are knowledgeable or simply
interested in this area to assist in performing this survey.

Our aim is to gather sufficient information to be able to validate the
ORMF model, which is currently being elaborated, against its ability to
support each of the candidate requirement standards. The main task
would be to perform a general survey of the industry. This would take
the form of a list of standards, a short description of its focus,
intent, purpose, etc., and a list of the documentation that is
generally produced by the practitioners of the standard (with pro forma
examples where possible). From this list and the recommendations of the
survey participants, the team will select the candidate standards,
which will be used for the model validation process. If at all
possible, the model will be refined to fit the requirements of those
standards.

At the end of the process the ORMF team will be confident in the
framework's ability to support the chosen standards and future
development efforts will be directed towards this aim.

If you would be interested in contributing to the survey or you are
simply interested in monitoring the progress, please send me an email
and also sign yourself up to the Eclipse bugzilla issue that has been
opened to collaborate and document this effort.

Please note that contribution to this effort is not limited to Eclipse
committers, so if you have colleagues who you think might be interested
in following, commenting on and/or contributing to this effort, please
pass on this information.

Many thanks,
Joel
--
Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Etish Limited [http://www.etish.org]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^...^
/ o,o \ The proud parents of Useme & ORMF
|) ::: (| Open Requirements Management Framework
====w=w==== [http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #12996 is a reply to message #12967] Sun, 12 October 2008 09:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Joel Rosi-Schwartz is currently offline Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Messages: 624
Registered: July 2009
Location: London. England
Senior Member
The Bugzilla link did not survive the post. It is
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=250565>

Joel
Re: Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #14103 is a reply to message #12967] Sun, 19 October 2008 10:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

Besides my earlier suggestion to use i18n standards within Eclipse
(Babel) from day 1 of the still planned project I would like to know,
if the also still incubating project ALF provides some interaction or
synergy points for ORMF?

While I have not looked into their stuff lately and they seem to have
gathered very little supporters from the whole ALM "buzz" (except
Serena) I would consider RM a distinct part of ALM. And therefore while
not suggesting to put ORMF under the "Umbrella" of ALM (like WTP is a
"Super Project" for many others now) yet, I strongly see some ways you
should try to interact.

Unless ALF is dead already or has gone back to Melmac ?!;-)

Werner
Re: Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #14187 is a reply to message #14103] Wed, 22 October 2008 08:39 Go to previous message
Joel Rosi-Schwartz is currently offline Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Messages: 624
Registered: July 2009
Location: London. England
Senior Member
Hi Werner,

I think it would better if replied to these questions in individual
threads. I will open them now.

Cheers,
Joel

On 2008-10-19 16:25:32 +0200, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmx.net> said:

> Hi,
>
> Besides my earlier suggestion to use i18n standards within Eclipse
> (Babel) from day 1 of the still planned project I would like to know,
> if the also still incubating project ALF provides some interaction or
> synergy points for ORMF?
>
> While I have not looked into their stuff lately and they seem to have
> gathered very little supporters from the whole ALM "buzz" (except
> Serena) I would consider RM a distinct part of ALM. And therefore while
> not suggesting to put ORMF under the "Umbrella" of ALM (like WTP is a
> "Super Project" for many others now) yet, I strongly see some ways you
> should try to interact.
>
> Unless ALF is dead already or has gone back to Melmac ?!;-)
>
> Werner
Re: Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #564396 is a reply to message #12967] Sun, 12 October 2008 09:53 Go to previous message
Joel Rosi-Schwartz is currently offline Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Messages: 624
Registered: July 2009
Location: London. England
Senior Member
The Bugzilla link did not survive the post. It is
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=250565>

Joel
Re: Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #564744 is a reply to message #12967] Sun, 19 October 2008 10:25 Go to previous message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

Besides my earlier suggestion to use i18n standards within Eclipse
(Babel) from day 1 of the still planned project I would like to know,
if the also still incubating project ALF provides some interaction or
synergy points for ORMF?

While I have not looked into their stuff lately and they seem to have
gathered very little supporters from the whole ALM "buzz" (except
Serena) I would consider RM a distinct part of ALM. And therefore while
not suggesting to put ORMF under the "Umbrella" of ALM (like WTP is a
"Super Project" for many others now) yet, I strongly see some ways you
should try to interact.

Unless ALF is dead already or has gone back to Melmac ?!;-)

Werner
Re: Survey of requirements management standards [Call for participation] [message #564820 is a reply to message #14103] Wed, 22 October 2008 08:39 Go to previous message
Joel Rosi-Schwartz is currently offline Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Messages: 624
Registered: July 2009
Location: London. England
Senior Member
Hi Werner,

I think it would better if replied to these questions in individual
threads. I will open them now.

Cheers,
Joel

On 2008-10-19 16:25:32 +0200, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmx.net> said:

> Hi,
>
> Besides my earlier suggestion to use i18n standards within Eclipse
> (Babel) from day 1 of the still planned project I would like to know,
> if the also still incubating project ALF provides some interaction or
> synergy points for ORMF?
>
> While I have not looked into their stuff lately and they seem to have
> gathered very little supporters from the whole ALM "buzz" (except
> Serena) I would consider RM a distinct part of ALM. And therefore while
> not suggesting to put ORMF under the "Umbrella" of ALM (like WTP is a
> "Super Project" for many others now) yet, I strongly see some ways you
> should try to interact.
>
> Unless ALF is dead already or has gone back to Melmac ?!;-)
>
> Werner
Previous Topic:The project plan is hatched
Next Topic:Will ORMF be collabortating with ALF
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Aug 20 22:22:57 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01983 seconds