|
| Re: [Eugenia] Including certain GMF options? [message #12808 is a reply to message #12769] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 12:12   |
 Dimitrios Kolovos
Messages: 1776
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michael,
There is no straightforward way to do this yet I'm afraid for custom
annotations. However, we are planning to provide support for
user-defined transformations that extend the functionality of the
default ones so that people can add and exploit custom annotations.
This said, there appear to be some specific options such as the ones you
mentioned that subsequent versions of Eugenia could support out-of-the-box.
Could you please write down a list of such annotations that you'd like
to see in future versions of EuGENia (annotations in the metamodel + how
they should be reflected in the generated models). If you could also
raise an enhancement request in the bugzilla, that'd be great!
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Michael Moser wrote:
> I guess there is no way to include certain gmfgen options already in the
> .emf file, is there?
> I would find it cool, if one could set certain flags like the "Same file
> for diagram and model"-option or the file extension already in the .emf
> file.
>
> Spinning this further: what would really be cool, would be a possibility
> to include arbitrary .gmftool / .gmfgraph (e.g. icon file names) /
> .gmfmap and - most importantly - .gmfgen flags (like the ones mentioned)
> already in the .emf file and hence - by means of annotations - also in
> the .ecore file.
>
> I have no idea, whether that is possible but I think it would be a great
> feature for Eugenia and EMF!
>
> Michael
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [Eugenia] Including certain GMF options? [message #565510 is a reply to message #12769] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 12:12 |
Dimitrios Kolovos
Messages: 1776
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michael,
There is no straightforward way to do this yet I'm afraid for custom
annotations. However, we are planning to provide support for
user-defined transformations that extend the functionality of the
default ones so that people can add and exploit custom annotations.
This said, there appear to be some specific options such as the ones you
mentioned that subsequent versions of Eugenia could support out-of-the-box.
Could you please write down a list of such annotations that you'd like
to see in future versions of EuGENia (annotations in the metamodel + how
they should be reflected in the generated models). If you could also
raise an enhancement request in the bugzilla, that'd be great!
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Michael Moser wrote:
> I guess there is no way to include certain gmfgen options already in the
> .emf file, is there?
> I would find it cool, if one could set certain flags like the "Same file
> for diagram and model"-option or the file extension already in the .emf
> file.
>
> Spinning this further: what would really be cool, would be a possibility
> to include arbitrary .gmftool / .gmfgraph (e.g. icon file names) /
> .gmfmap and - most importantly - .gmfgen flags (like the ones mentioned)
> already in the .emf file and hence - by means of annotations - also in
> the .ecore file.
>
> I have no idea, whether that is possible but I think it would be a great
> feature for Eugenia and EMF!
>
> Michael
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.38514 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
