Frederic Conrotte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently using an ActiveMQ JMS broker to handle all internal and
> external messaging within OFMP.
>
> We are quite satisfied with current ActiveMQ (5.1) but it seems performance
> wise it might be worth taking a look at other JMS implementation like the
> new JBoss Messaging 2.0 :
> http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbossmessag ing/freezone/docs/userguide-2.0.0.alpha1/html/performance.ht ml#performance.results
>
> Fred
>
>
At least a former customer I worked for reported issues with JBoss MQ
compared to e.g. BEA's implementation (8.1 or 9.x) but of course they
might have used an older less stable release...
Frederic Conrotte wrote:
> Werner Keil a écrit :
>> Are the messages sent as plain text or xml btw?
> Messages are binary JMS ObjectMessage casted to specific types.
>
> Fred
Thanks for the update.
Since you mentioned EJB in a different thread here, do those include MDBs?
Frederic Conrotte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently using an ActiveMQ JMS broker to handle all internal and
> external messaging within OFMP.
>
> We are quite satisfied with current ActiveMQ (5.1) but it seems performance
> wise it might be worth taking a look at other JMS implementation like the
> new JBoss Messaging 2.0 :
> http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbossmessag ing/freezone/docs/userguide-2.0.0.alpha1/html/performance.ht ml#performance.results
>
> Fred
>
>
At least a former customer I worked for reported issues with JBoss MQ
compared to e.g. BEA's implementation (8.1 or 9.x) but of course they
might have used an older less stable release...
Frederic Conrotte wrote:
> Werner Keil a écrit :
>> Are the messages sent as plain text or xml btw?
> Messages are binary JMS ObjectMessage casted to specific types.
>
> Fred
Thanks for the update.
Since you mentioned EJB in a different thread here, do those include MDBs?