| Global AdapterFactory vs one per each EditingDomain [message #904383]
||Tue, 28 August 2012 06:59
| Sorin Fagateanu
Registered: July 2009
What are the differences of using the same instance of an AdapterFactory with all loaded EditingDomains over using an AdapterFactory per each loaded EditingDomain?
The first difference that comes to my mind is that when using a global AdapterFactory, only a single set of item providers exist whereas using one per each EditingDomain would result in a set of item providers for each domain.
Is the performance (memory, speed) of the overall EMF mechanism affected in any way by using a global instance?
What are the other important/notable differences?
Thank you in advance,
[Updated on: Tue, 28 August 2012 07:02]
Report message to a moderator
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01594 seconds