| Persons and Responsibilities [message #902660] |
Sun, 19 August 2012 02:33  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
this time I have a more conceptual question. In my UML model I have designed the systems architecture. Now I want to specify, who (a Person) is responsible for the design of certain model elements and who is responsible for the implementation.
I.e. assuming I have a Package P1, I want to say: Mister Smith is responsible for the design of the elements in P1 and Mrs. West is responsible for the implementation of these elements.
How would you define this in UML? Is there a profile that is designed for this purpose?
A UML Actor is a role and not a certain person right? And is there an association kind that is suitable to specify responsibilities?
Regards,
Tex
|
|
|
| Re: Persons and Responsibilities [message #902678 is a reply to message #902660] |
Sun, 19 August 2012 05:25  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi
If you really want to program it, then there are various modeling
options, but I suspect that you are dealing with the greater lifecycle
for which you should look at whatever SysML, UPDM, ... has to offer.
Beyond my knowledge.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 19/08/2012 07:33, Tex Iano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this time I have a more conceptual question. In my UML model I have
> designed the systems architecture. Now I want to specify, who (a
> Person) is responsible for the design of certain model elements and
> who is responsible for the implementation.
>
> I.e. assuming I have a Package P1, I want to say: Mister Smith is
> responsible for the design of the elements in P1 and Mrs. West is
> responsible for the implementation of these elements.
>
> How would you define this in UML? Is there a profile that is designed
> for this purpose?
>
> A UML Actor is a role and not a certain person right? And is there an
> association kind that is suitable to specify responsibilities?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tex
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.19851 seconds
Home