Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Orbit » org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license
org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license [message #9175] Mon, 09 April 2007 01:12 Go to next message
Matt McCutchen is currently offline Matt McCutchen
Messages: 32
Registered: July 2009
Member
I noticed that the Orbit project org.w3c.dom exports the dummy package
"license" containing its license files. I'm guessing this is a mistake.
If so, please remove the export.

Matt
Re: org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license [message #9197 is a reply to message #9175] Tue, 17 April 2007 18:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt McCutchen is currently offline Matt McCutchen
Messages: 32
Registered: July 2009
Member
Good, I notice that the replacement bundle org.apache.xerces.xml.apis
has the bogus export removed.

Matt

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:12 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I noticed that the Orbit project org.w3c.dom exports the dummy package
> "license" containing its license files. I'm guessing this is a mistake.
> If so, please remove the export.
Re: org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license [message #9216 is a reply to message #9197] Thu, 19 April 2007 01:33 Go to previous message
David Williams is currently offline David Williams
Messages: 696
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:23:30 -0400, Matt McCutchen <hashproduct+eclipse@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good, I notice that the replacement bundle org.apache.xerces.xml.apis
> has the bogus export removed.
>
> Matt
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:12 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> I noticed that the Orbit project org.w3c.dom exports the dummy package
>> "license" containing its license files. I'm guessing this is a mistake.
>> If so, please remove the export.
>
>

There's been some discussion on the orbit-dev list that concluded that
org.apache.xerces.xml.apis was not the right replacemnet for the bundle
named org.w3c.dom ... that we really should go to the effort of splitting up
that bundle into it's three "original" parts, org.w3c.dom, org.xml.sax, and javax.xml.
So, in the mean time, we'll leave org.w3c.com ... so I will go ahead and correct it,
if I haven't yet, and with any luck we'll get the proper 3 in place by the time 2.0
is released ... without exporting the license directories :)

In the future, feel free to open bugs in the orbit component of the Tools "product" in our
eclipse bugzilla.

Thanks,
Re: org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license [message #562525 is a reply to message #9175] Tue, 17 April 2007 18:23 Go to previous message
Matt McCutchen is currently offline Matt McCutchen
Messages: 32
Registered: July 2009
Member
Good, I notice that the replacement bundle org.apache.xerces.xml.apis
has the bogus export removed.

Matt

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:12 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I noticed that the Orbit project org.w3c.dom exports the dummy package
> "license" containing its license files. I'm guessing this is a mistake.
> If so, please remove the export.
Re: org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license [message #562550 is a reply to message #9197] Thu, 19 April 2007 01:33 Go to previous message
David Williams is currently offline David Williams
Messages: 696
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:23:30 -0400, Matt McCutchen <hashproduct+eclipse@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good, I notice that the replacement bundle org.apache.xerces.xml.apis
> has the bogus export removed.
>
> Matt
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:12 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> I noticed that the Orbit project org.w3c.dom exports the dummy package
>> "license" containing its license files. I'm guessing this is a mistake.
>> If so, please remove the export.
>
>

There's been some discussion on the orbit-dev list that concluded that
org.apache.xerces.xml.apis was not the right replacemnet for the bundle
named org.w3c.dom ... that we really should go to the effort of splitting up
that bundle into it's three "original" parts, org.w3c.dom, org.xml.sax, and javax.xml.
So, in the mean time, we'll leave org.w3c.com ... so I will go ahead and correct it,
if I haven't yet, and with any luck we'll get the proper 3 in place by the time 2.0
is released ... without exporting the license directories :)

In the future, feel free to open bugs in the orbit component of the Tools "product" in our
eclipse bugzilla.

Thanks,
Previous Topic:org.w3c.dom probably should not Export-Package: license
Next Topic:Script to "Refresh Tags" on Orbit bundles
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jul 31 01:23:47 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01544 seconds