|Am i using the mylyn context in the right way? [message #778007]
||Wed, 11 January 2012 09:33
| paul rime
Registered: July 2009
actually we are evaluate the integration of mylyn in our development process. In the last sprints we used mylyn with a redmine-connector to manage our task.
One importent part of our development process is the task-review. A particular part is the codereview. In our case it is done by two developers, the developer who has done the task and a second developer of the team.
We highly use the mark as landmark feature in mylyn to mark the relevant classes or methods. This is done during the coding time. At the review the relevevant artefacts are in the visible context and the landmarks can be used as a hint for all relevant changes during the review.
Now we recognized that landmarked artefacts (e.g. types or methods) can disappear from the visible mylyn context because the priority of an artefact decreases. Up to now we thought a landmarked artefact wouldn't disappear from the visible context.
Is that a proper way to use the mylyn context?
Could it be a bug that a landmarked artefact disappears from the visible context?
Has anybody experience in doing code review by using mylyn or is that a kind of misuse?
[Updated on: Wed, 11 January 2012 09:34]
Report message to a moderator
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.60433 seconds