Eclipse Community Forums: SeMantic Information Logistics Architecture (SMILA) » misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker

Home » Eclipse Projects » SeMantic Information Logistics Architecture (SMILA) » misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker [message #730029]

Tue, 27 September 2011 09:38

thomas menzel
Messages: 81
Registered: July 2009

Member

looking at the code it actually controls the size of the bunch to be
processed in *sequence* by a pipeline.

i vote to rename this to: pipelineRunBulkSize

admittedly the bulk in this name might be confusing but i think that's
fits best.

alternatively we could use pipelineMaxRecordCount, pipelineRunChunkSize
or others in that line of though

see
http://wiki.eclipse.org/SMILA/Documentation/Worker/PipelineProcessingWorker

--
thomas menzel aka tom

thomas menzel aka tom

Report message to a moderator

Re: misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker [message #730311 is a reply to message #730029]

Wed, 28 September 2011 02:51

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: J

Report message to a moderator

Re: misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker [message #730333 is a reply to message #730029]

Wed, 28 September 2011 03:46

Juergen Schumacher
Messages: 32
Registered: July 2009

Member

(Re-Post, because the web-interface seems to have problems with the umlaut
in my name ...)

Yeah, picking names is always the hard part, isn't it (;

I think you're right, the "parallel" is misleading.
Concerning a better name: I'm not able yet to make a decision...

Cheers,
Jürgen

Am 27.09.2011, 15:38 Uhr, schrieb thomas menzel <tmenzel@brox.de>:

> looking at the code it actually controls the size of the bunch to be
> processed in *sequence* by a pipeline.
>
> i vote to rename this to: pipelineRunBulkSize
>
> admittedly the bulk in this name might be confusing but i think that's
> fits best.
>
> alternatively we could use pipelineMaxRecordCount, pipelineRunChunkSize
> or others in that line of though
>
> see
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/SMILA/Documentation/Worker/PipelineProcessingWorker
>

--
Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Report message to a moderator

Re: misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker [message #730348 is a reply to message #730333]

Wed, 28 September 2011 04:17

nadine.auslaender
Messages: 1
Registered: September 2011

Junior Member

Hi,

I agree, numberOfParallelRecords does not fit here and pipelineRunBulkSize is a much better name.

You have my vote, too. Wink

Regards
Nadine

Report message to a moderator

Re: misnomer numberOfParallelRecords for PipelineProcessingWorker [message #730355 is a reply to message #730348]

Wed, 28 September 2011 04:17

Juergen Schumacher
Messages: 32
Registered: July 2009

Member

Am 28.09.2011, 10:17 Uhr, schrieb nadine.auslaender
<forums-noreply@eclipse.org>:

> Hi, I agree, numberOfParallelRecords does not fit here and
> pipelineRunBulkSize is a much better name. You have my vote, too. ;)
>
> Regards
> Nadine

Ok .. I'm changing it.

Cheers
Jürgen.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Re: zookeeper info/error NoNode for /smila/XXXX
Next Topic:	Release 0.9 is out!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sat May 18 23:52:22 EDT 2013