|Re: Associations should avoid obstacles? [message #5917 is a reply to message #5900]
||Thu, 22 January 2009 23:36
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com|
Benoit Beaudet wrote:
> Congrats for the hard work you made for BPMN and Babel projects! You'll
> fix the update site ;)
There is so much work left to actually do the build right... Oisin did a
global RC4 build available on the STP update site. But indeed this isn't
serious. We need to get there.
> I want to know if it's a good idea to allow associations to find path
> like other connections? Currently, associations arrows overlap with
> activities. I can bend them, but isn't auto-magic.
The other connections have recognizable patterns. We just allowed two
bend points, and we found a way to record their position changes.
For the associations, it's a bit more tedious.
It's very difficult to have an algorithm that detects successfully
collisions and make connections look good. It ends up consuming quite a
lot of resources, and is error prone.
I tend to think that bugzilla is a good tickler for action items though.
So please feel free to file an enhancement request. I won't be able to
address it before long though.
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.02724 seconds