Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Buckminster dev » Wrong Emma Basic Block Count in Report
Wrong Emma Basic Block Count in Report [message #639143] Mon, 15 November 2010 07:13 Go to next message
Marcel Hoetter is currently offline Marcel Hoetter
Messages: 28
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hi Buckminster team,

comparing Emma coverage results from reports generated in my Eclipse IDE and via Buckminster (3.6),
it came to my attention that the number of basic blocks reported by Buckminster is wrong: it
represents the number of instructions instead.

The actual basic block count is not reported at all.

I think this is related to Emma Bug 2470533:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid =2470533&group_id=108932&atid=651897

The bug is still open, but seems to be fixed in recent Emma versions.

Is a version bump in Buckminster possible?

Greetings,

Marcel
Re: Wrong Emma Basic Block Count in Report [message #641662 is a reply to message #639143] Fri, 26 November 2010 09:50 Go to previous message
Marcel Hoetter is currently offline Marcel Hoetter
Messages: 28
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
I created a bug report for this:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=330791
Previous Topic:[buckminster-dev] Passing javac parameter
Next Topic:[buckminster-dev] Status on Buckminster Mercurial Plugin
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jul 30 03:11:31 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03274 seconds