|Re: DataShareRMI [message #609276 is a reply to message #609275]
||Fri, 24 November 2006 01:09
| Remy Suen
Registered: July 2009
Hi Scott and Pierre,|
Scott Lewis wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
> I think without a lot of objection (from Peter and/or others) we should
> probably deprecate datashare.rmi...as it was an early effort at
> datashare which I think has been replaced by org.eclipse.ecf.datashare.
> If others have other view please say so, as with 0.9.3 API refactoring
> it's probably not going to make sense to maintain everything going forward.
With regards to "deprecation", how do we want to deal with those CVS
modules? Leave them in CVS or move them in the attic or have webmaster
delete them (are those two the same thing?)? I guess if we leave them in
we should probably leave a note in the root project folder.
On the other hand, there is of course the maintenance issue that Scott
points out. I think in the case of org.eclipse.ecf.fileshare it should
probably be deleted/removed outright. But for datashare.rmi maybe it can
be left there (with a note or something on the website) in case someone
else wants to pick it up and maintain it in the future?
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01788 seconds