Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Eclipse Communications Framework (ECF) » DataShareRMI
DataShareRMI [message #609273] Thu, 23 November 2006 22:59 Go to next message
Pierre-Henry Perret is currently offline Pierre-Henry Perret
Messages: 33
Registered: July 2009
Member
Scott,

I have some problems datashare.rmi plugin which seems to lack some
components (JoinException, Participant - is it ui.views Participant ?) ...
Re: DataShareRMI [message #609275 is a reply to message #609273] Thu, 23 November 2006 23:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Scott Lewis is currently offline Scott Lewis
Messages: 970
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Pierre,

I think without a lot of objection (from Peter and/or others) we should
probably deprecate datashare.rmi...as it was an early effort at
datashare which I think has been replaced by org.eclipse.ecf.datashare.

If others have other view please say so, as with 0.9.3 API refactoring
it's probably not going to make sense to maintain everything going forward.

Scott

Pierre-Henry Perret wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I have some problems datashare.rmi plugin which seems to lack some
> components (JoinException, Participant - is it ui.views Participant ?) ...
>
>
>
Re: DataShareRMI [message #609276 is a reply to message #609275] Fri, 24 November 2006 01:09 Go to previous message
Remy Suen is currently offline Remy Suen
Messages: 462
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Scott and Pierre,

Scott Lewis wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> I think without a lot of objection (from Peter and/or others) we should
> probably deprecate datashare.rmi...as it was an early effort at
> datashare which I think has been replaced by org.eclipse.ecf.datashare.
>
> If others have other view please say so, as with 0.9.3 API refactoring
> it's probably not going to make sense to maintain everything going forward.

With regards to "deprecation", how do we want to deal with those CVS
modules? Leave them in CVS or move them in the attic or have webmaster
delete them (are those two the same thing?)? I guess if we leave them in
we should probably leave a note in the root project folder.

On the other hand, there is of course the maintenance issue that Scott
points out. I think in the case of org.eclipse.ecf.fileshare it should
probably be deleted/removed outright. But for datashare.rmi maybe it can
be left there (with a note or something on the website) in case someone
else wants to pick it up and maintain it in the future?

Thoughts, anyone?

Regards,
Rem
Previous Topic:ECF 0.93 Woes
Next Topic:Remote Services Registration
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Sep 17 19:39:44 GMT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03862 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software