|Re: Reusing SCA Service Implementations [message #573306]
||Wed, 01 October 2008 12:49
|| Mickael Istria
Registered: July 2009
Location: Grenoble, France
I clicked "Reply" without checking the forum.
Sorry for the spam...
Mickael Istria a écrit :
> Hi Michael, all
> Michael Gebhart a écrit :
>> when using the SCA editor to create my service architecture, I can
>> easily implement services. I can write a java class and set it as the
>> implementation of a component.
> Yes, it is easy to design composites and write implementations for
> components with SCA editor.
>> My question is: Can I only use this implementation within a SCA
>> runtime? We have a typical application server running and don't wanna
>> provide a SCA runtime. But we'd like to use SCA for modeling the
> I think that the implementation you wrote does not depend on SCA
> runtime, it only depends on SCA annotations (@Reference, @Property...),
> but those annotation don't change your class logic, thus you can use
> your classes out of SCA context (but you'll have to provide the jar
> containing SCA references to resolve annotations).
> But the question that comes to me ie "why don't you use a SCA runtime?".
> I understand that there may be conflicts because with some applications
> server, but it is worse trying...
>> Or do we have to manually adapt the implementation that it works
>> within a typical WS-compliant java application server?
> I can't help you on this topic.
>> Is the SCA way an alternative for the usual web service programming?
>> Is it still necessary to write the web services as we have done it
>> before? (Using JAX-WS etc.)
> SCA is an alternative for generic (Java-friendly) service programming. I
> often use it to expose WebServices simply by creating a java component
> that exposes its service through a binding.ws, and it works quite well
> without brainstorming:
> <composite ...>
> <component name="myComponent">
> <implementation.java class="package.ServiceImpl" />
> <service name="myService">
> <interface.java interface="package.IService" />
> <binding.ws uri="http://localhost:8081/endpoint" />
> Then, you have a web service published on localhost:8081/endpoint, and
> your SCA runtime made everything necessary to get it working, you simply
> wrote the composite, the interface, and the implementation (only
> business code)
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.10898 seconds