Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Service Oriented Architecture Tools Platform (STP) » RE: [stp-newsgroup] from IRD today
RE: [stp-newsgroup] from IRD today [message #571095] Wed, 11 January 2006 15:08 Go to next message
Eclipse User
Originally posted by: ASAKALA.iona.com

> 1. get a concrete proposal for our build system before the
> IRC next weeks IRC
I would like to strongly recommend using Maven 2 for build system.
Both Tuscany and Celtix projects are using maven and i assume it will be a good logical thing to use.

thanks,
Adi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trieloff, Carl
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:50 PM
> To: Gateway between eclipse.stp and stp-newsgroup
> Subject: [stp-newsgroup] from IRD today
>
>
>
>
> Two actions from IRC today.
>
> 1. get a concrete proposal for our build system before the
> IRC next weeks IRC
> 2. Get the basic pages up for STP project on eclipse.org
>
> Regards
> Carl.
>
>
>
>
> [12:03] cctrieloff: It does not seem that everyone got the
> details for the IRC today.
> [12:04] cctrieloff: We will wait a few minutes and then get started
> [12:05] cctrieloff: did you get it from the list?
> [12:05] rmarins: I'm fine. yes, I got from the newsgroup
> [12:05] cctrieloff: great, I have 4 guys on the phone, that
> could get onto IRC, so I will act as the bridge
> [12:06] rmarins: it'll hard for you, but let's see how works
> [12:07] cctrieloff: have you got your committer setup back
> from the eclipse EMO for STP yet?
> [12:08] rmarins: yep, i sent agreements by fax yesterday
> morning, and filled up the questionary by today
> [12:09] rmarins: i mean, on my side it's almost done. I'm
> waiting for my account
> [12:09] cctrieloff: Seems to be the common state that we are
> all still waiting for accounts.
> [12:10] cctrieloff: I have been testing the dev lists and
> they have not yet come live, however I expect that CVS might be up
> [12:12] cctrieloff: For the build system we have 3 options
> [12:13] cctrieloff: we have the option form ObjectWeb, from
> Adrian and then a maven setup for build
> [12:14] cctrieloff: what we want to do is have all options
> for the build system discussed by the end of next week, and
> the we will set a team up to get a hello world building,
> build the tests, run the test and the coverage
> [12:15] cctrieloff: that sound reasonable?
> [12:15] DavidBosschaert: Sounds great!
> [12:16] cctrieloff: As an action we ask for all those that
> want to be involved in buildset to self identify and pitch in
> over the next week in working that out
> [12:16] rmarins: looks good, however I miss the point
> regarding the ObjectWeb option and from Adrian
> [12:17] cctrieloff: Someone form ObjectWeb has said that they
> would like to be involved and had some ideas around this area
> [12:17] cctrieloff: The goal will be to have a proposal to
> implement for the IRC next week
> [12:18] cctrieloff: Talking about the creation of the Website
> [12:19] cctrieloff: What I was thinking was to copy the basic
> structure from WTP for home, about , committer page and CVS
> questions etc
> [12:20] cctrieloff: I will then place our charter
> [12:21] cctrieloff: and then we will build the STP specific
> content form there, all ok with that?
> [12:21] DavidBosschaert: Sounds like a good starting point.
> [12:22] rmarins: yep. just remember: including subprojects sections
> [12:23] cctrieloff: are you saying we should include the
> subprojects in the initial setup of the page?
> [12:25] rmarins: yes, subprojects description. thus, we setup
> each subproject specific pages
> [12:25] cctrieloff: I think that we might want get the
> project text reviewed by a larger group.
> [12:25] cctrieloff: ok just the subprojects and a basic
> description, then add the pages behind that with group review?
> [12:25] rmarins: yes, that's right!
> [12:27] cctrieloff: we have closed the audio. We will action
> these two items for next week while we wait out lists and CVS
> from the EMO
> [12:28] rmarins: good. until there, discussions go under the
> current newsgroups, right?
> [12:29] cctrieloff: correct
> [12:29] cctrieloff: I will post this to the news list
> [12:29] rmarins: great
> _______________________________________________
> stp-newsgroup mailing list
> stp-newsgroup@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-newsgroup
>
Re: [stp-newsgroup] from IRD today [message #571219 is a reply to message #571095] Wed, 11 January 2006 15:57 Go to previous message
Eclipse User
Originally posted by: rmarins.fossilec.com

I don't known others build system options suggested as mentioned on
today's chat, but I would like to known if there are. However, I believe
that Maven option is an unanimous choice - we're also using with Petals.

BTW, I would like to see directories structure and modules
standardization on this build system proposal next week. So, there are
some structure often used by Eclipse projects? (or should we start to
specify one)

Regards,

Rafael Marins.


Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
>>1. get a concrete proposal for our build system before the
>>IRC next weeks IRC
>
> I would like to strongly recommend using Maven 2 for build system.
> Both Tuscany and Celtix projects are using maven and i assume it will be a good logical thing to use.
>
> thanks,
> Adi
>
>
Previous Topic:RE: [stp-newsgroup] STP Weekly IRC/ Call
Next Topic:RE: [stp-newsgroup] from IRD today
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 21 08:49:49 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01686 seconds