| Re: Using Riena only for the server/client connectivity [message #564183] |
Sun, 21 September 2008 18:52 |
|
Hi Christian,
Thanks for all of the replies :-)
The clean separation is certainly what I expected, but best to make
sure before leaping in. I really thank you folks as you have saved ORMF
(me in particular) quite a bit of work in wiring the base server
infrastructure and remoting. I will certainly look forward to buying
the Riena team a beer at the next EclipseCon or the Summit if we can
make it this autumn.
I actually think that we will be seeing more and more projects using
OSGi servers with remoting capability. I would really encourage the
Riena team to package and "market" this as a separate "product", i.e. a
feature on the update site or packaged zip. The space is waiting to be
filled.
Btw, I am curious as to why you chose Hessian. I am quite content with
the choice, just wondering.
All the best,
Joel
On 2008-09-21 19:23:00 +0100, Christian Campo
<christian.campo@compeople.de> said:
> Hi Joel,
>
> indeed its basic requirement of Riena that you dont have to buy into
> the whole story of Riena if you just like a component of it. So just
> using Riena remote services is ok and should always work. You will only
> need a few bundles and you are ready to go.
>
> We have the same now for the UI part that you should be able to use
> Ridgets without using the navigation concept of Riena or you can embed
> Riena views into RCP applications or vica versa embed RCP views into
> Riena applications.
>
> If anything of that what I promising does not work, its certainly a bug
> and will be treated as such.
>
> let me help if I you need more info
>
> christian
>
>
>
> Joel Rosi-Schwartz schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please allow me to introduce myself. My name is Joel and I am one of
>> the leads of the EF ORMF project <http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/>
>>
>> We are in the process of reengineering our architecture with the
>> intention of moving away from a full blow Java 5 EE server (Glassfish)
>> to a lighter weight OSGI infrastructure. Presently the communication
>> between our Eclipse client and the server is Web Services based, so I
>> think that the Riena server may be just what I am looking for in a base
>> architecture.
>>
>> What makes me a little nervous is that the scope of Riena is much
>> broader than ORMF requires. I would like to assure myself that ORMF
>> will not be required to carry a substantial amount of extra baggage is
>> we adopt Riena. So far my limited reading and explorations leads me to
>> believe that Riena is cleanly partitioned so that we should have few
>> issues. I would be very appreciate if someone from the team could
>> confirm my assumptions.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Joel
--
Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Etish Limited [http://www.etish.org]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^...^
/ o,o \ The proud parents of Useme & ORMF
|) ::: (| Open Requirements Management Framework
====w=w==== [http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02371 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
