| Code completion and broken AST [message #541968] |
Wed, 23 June 2010 08:17  |
Jan F. Messages: 6 Registered: June 2010 |
Junior Member |
|
|
What is the DLTK's typical approach for working with AST that is broken by interim edits, such as typing "this." to invoke code completion?
Is there a concept of using the previous cached AST, or should the parser rather be made to be resistent to any interim editing and provide the structure down to method/fields/lcoal vars in all possible cases?
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01879 seconds