|
|
| Re: Reopening a bug? [message #51111 is a reply to message #50971] |
Mon, 25 April 2005 13:28  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mchapman.uk.ibm.com
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:01:00 -0500, Barry Kaplan wrote:
> I have added a comment to a bug indicating a regression from 1.2.0M1 to
> 1.2.0M2. Will the development team see that comment and reopen, or need
> I create a new issue? (bug 43547)
Yes, we receive email notification of comments. And yes you should be able
to reopen bugs yourself, as Eric points out. However, as your further
comments on the bug suggest, this looks like the problem is only happening
in certain cases, which may have always been the case, so it is not really
a regression. Therefore a new bug might be best. Or maybe your
problem is already covered by bug 88474? Also, presumably you mean
1.2.0M3, instead of M2?
Regards,
Matt.
--
Matt Chapman
AJDT Development, http://www.eclipse.org/ajdt
|
|
|
|
| Re: Reopening a bug? [message #587896 is a reply to message #50971] |
Mon, 25 April 2005 13:28 |
 Matt Chapman
Messages: 429
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:01:00 -0500, Barry Kaplan wrote:
> I have added a comment to a bug indicating a regression from 1.2.0M1 to
> 1.2.0M2. Will the development team see that comment and reopen, or need
> I create a new issue? (bug 43547)
Yes, we receive email notification of comments. And yes you should be able
to reopen bugs yourself, as Eric points out. However, as your further
comments on the bug suggest, this looks like the problem is only happening
in certain cases, which may have always been the case, so it is not really
a regression. Therefore a new bug might be best. Or maybe your
problem is already covered by bug 88474? Also, presumably you mean
1.2.0M3, instead of M2?
Regards,
Matt.
--
Matt Chapman
AJDT Development, http://www.eclipse.org/ajdt
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03879 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
