Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » OHF » STEM Creation Review
STEM Creation Review [message #49947] Tue, 10 March 2009 21:27 Go to next message
Anne Jacko is currently offline Anne Jacko
Messages: 122
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello all,

Since there has not been a request from a member of the Eclipse community
to hold this review on a conference call, there will be no Review Call
tomorrow (March 11, 2009).

The EMO has declared this review to be successful based on the review
docuware and on community feedback. Congratulations to the STEM team on
their successful review.

Please contact emo@eclipse.org with any questions. Thanks.
Re: STEM Creation Review [message #49977 is a reply to message #49947] Wed, 18 March 2009 23:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Congratulations,

Will the newsgroup remain here?

Werner
Re: STEM Creation Review [message #50006 is a reply to message #49977] Mon, 30 March 2009 13:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Daniel Ford is currently offline Daniel Ford
Messages: 138
Registered: July 2009
Location: New York
Senior Member
We should be moving to a new group. Likely eclipse.technology.stem, but
things are still in process.

--
Daniel Ford
IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose, CA
Re: STEM Creation Review [message #50036 is a reply to message #50006] Sun, 05 April 2009 17:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
IC,

It was created under eclipse.stem now.
Is this a new nomenclatura, or will it be moved to "technology" later, once
the proposal has been accepted??

"Daniel Ford" <daford@almaden.ibm.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:gqqg9f$abk$1@build.eclipse.org...
> We should be moving to a new group. Likely eclipse.technology.stem, but
> things are still in process.
>
> --
> Daniel Ford
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> San Jose, CA
>
STEM is now a project: Was Re: STEM Creation Review [message #50066 is a reply to message #50036] Mon, 06 April 2009 13:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Daniel Ford is currently offline Daniel Ford
Messages: 138
Registered: July 2009
Location: New York
Senior Member
STEM how has its own newsgroup called "eclipse.stem". They've changed the
naming scheme for newsgroups. It also has it's own project page at
http://www.eclipse.org/stem/ It is still a work in progress and mostly
points back to the old OHF pages for STEM until we migrate everything over.
There is also a STEM specific development mailing list stem-dev@eclipse.org

There is also a new SVN (not CVS) repository location for STEM at
http://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/technology/org.eclipse.stem/ The SVN
repository will be populated in stages as we refactor the code and migrate
the various plugins from the old OHF CVS to the new STEM SVN repositories.
It is currently empty. We'll likely have a transition period where we'll be
split across the two repositories. Any such changes will be announced on
the stem-dev mailing list.

The new STEM project summary page has all the details:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_summary.php?projecti d=technology.stem
--
Daniel Ford
IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose, CA


"Werner Keil" <werner.keil@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:grar5l$q44$1@build.eclipse.org...
> IC,
>
> It was created under eclipse.stem now.
> Is this a new nomenclatura, or will it be moved to "technology" later,
> once the proposal has been accepted??
>
> "Daniel Ford" <daford@almaden.ibm.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:gqqg9f$abk$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> We should be moving to a new group. Likely eclipse.technology.stem, but
>> things are still in process.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Ford
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> San Jose, CA
>>
>
Re: STEM is now a project: Was Re: STEM Creation Review [message #50096 is a reply to message #50066] Mon, 06 April 2009 22:15 Go to previous message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I'm not sure, if the mentioned CVS HEAD from OHF was also in there already?

As I maintain at least 2 different repositories myself for JSR-275 I am
familiar with juggling between the two systems.
I also found, that Eclipse project Subversive was despite a still rather odd
and uncomfortable 2 way installation quite good at creating and maintaining
Tags for various project stages or results.
Not done too much branching with SVN yet, but that one should usually handle
with care and at a low "dose" with most systems ;-)

Werner
Re: STEM Creation Review [message #588189 is a reply to message #49947] Wed, 18 March 2009 23:06 Go to previous message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Congratulations,

Will the newsgroup remain here?

Werner
Re: STEM Creation Review [message #588201 is a reply to message #49977] Mon, 30 March 2009 13:09 Go to previous message
Daniel Ford is currently offline Daniel Ford
Messages: 138
Registered: July 2009
Location: New York
Senior Member
We should be moving to a new group. Likely eclipse.technology.stem, but
things are still in process.

--
Daniel Ford
IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose, CA
Re: STEM Creation Review [message #588210 is a reply to message #50006] Sun, 05 April 2009 17:52 Go to previous message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
IC,

It was created under eclipse.stem now.
Is this a new nomenclatura, or will it be moved to "technology" later, once
the proposal has been accepted??

"Daniel Ford" <daford@almaden.ibm.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:gqqg9f$abk$1@build.eclipse.org...
> We should be moving to a new group. Likely eclipse.technology.stem, but
> things are still in process.
>
> --
> Daniel Ford
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> San Jose, CA
>
STEM is now a project: Was Re: STEM Creation Review [message #588218 is a reply to message #50036] Mon, 06 April 2009 13:16 Go to previous message
Daniel Ford is currently offline Daniel Ford
Messages: 138
Registered: July 2009
Location: New York
Senior Member
STEM how has its own newsgroup called "eclipse.stem". They've changed the
naming scheme for newsgroups. It also has it's own project page at
http://www.eclipse.org/stem/ It is still a work in progress and mostly
points back to the old OHF pages for STEM until we migrate everything over.
There is also a STEM specific development mailing list stem-dev@eclipse.org

There is also a new SVN (not CVS) repository location for STEM at
http://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/technology/org.eclipse.stem/ The SVN
repository will be populated in stages as we refactor the code and migrate
the various plugins from the old OHF CVS to the new STEM SVN repositories.
It is currently empty. We'll likely have a transition period where we'll be
split across the two repositories. Any such changes will be announced on
the stem-dev mailing list.

The new STEM project summary page has all the details:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_summary.php?projecti d=technology.stem
--
Daniel Ford
IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose, CA


"Werner Keil" <werner.keil@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:grar5l$q44$1@build.eclipse.org...
> IC,
>
> It was created under eclipse.stem now.
> Is this a new nomenclatura, or will it be moved to "technology" later,
> once the proposal has been accepted??
>
> "Daniel Ford" <daford@almaden.ibm.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:gqqg9f$abk$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> We should be moving to a new group. Likely eclipse.technology.stem, but
>> things are still in process.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Ford
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> San Jose, CA
>>
>
Re: STEM is now a project: Was Re: STEM Creation Review [message #588227 is a reply to message #50066] Mon, 06 April 2009 22:15 Go to previous message
Werner Keil is currently offline Werner Keil
Messages: 1083
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I'm not sure, if the mentioned CVS HEAD from OHF was also in there already?

As I maintain at least 2 different repositories myself for JSR-275 I am
familiar with juggling between the two systems.
I also found, that Eclipse project Subversive was despite a still rather odd
and uncomfortable 2 way installation quite good at creating and maintaining
Tags for various project stages or results.
Not done too much branching with SVN yet, but that one should usually handle
with care and at a low "dose" with most systems ;-)

Werner
Previous Topic:STEM Creation Review
Next Topic:store CDA into database
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 22 10:24:27 GMT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.20198 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software