Currently I'm trying to express relations between UML elements in a
profile.
For example I want to define that a 'connector' owns two 'connector ends'.
Do I do this using nested stereotypes (nesting two stereotypes extending a
connector end in a stereotype extending a connector), or is there another
way to express this relation?
Perhaps an OCL may be the best way to express such constraints?
- James.
"Samuel " <samuel.esposito@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea7215130db27df4f7b2e45a39546c1a$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm trying to express relations between UML elements in a
> profile. For example I want to define that a 'connector' owns two
> 'connector ends'. Do I do this using nested stereotypes (nesting two
> stereotypes extending a connector end in a stereotype extending a
> connector), or is there another way to express this relation?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Samuel
>
Perhaps an OCL may be the best way to express such constraints?
- James.
"Samuel " <samuel.esposito@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea7215130db27df4f7b2e45a39546c1a$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm trying to express relations between UML elements in a
> profile. For example I want to define that a 'connector' owns two
> 'connector ends'. Do I do this using nested stereotypes (nesting two
> stereotypes extending a connector end in a stereotype extending a
> connector), or is there another way to express this relation?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Samuel
>