Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » Modeling (top-level project) » [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project
[PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383574] Thu, 11 December 2008 12:12 Go to next message
Jean-Sebastien Sottet is currently offline Jean-Sebastien Sottet
Messages: 4
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hello,

We, AtlanMod team (an INRIA-EMN team led by Jean Bézivin), are
interested in participating to the PMF project. We have experience in
several Eclipse projects: M2M (model-to-model transformation with
ATL), GMT with the AM3, AMW, and Modisco components, and TMF with the
TCS component.

During his Ph.D. on Model Driven Adaptation of User Interfaces (UI)
Jean-Sébastien experienced the usage of model-to-model transformation
(M2M) as well as model-to-text (M2T), to generated user interfaces. He
unified around a generic UI model code generation from abstract and
data model to technology such as XUL, XAML, HTML and Swing.

We are in relation with other interested parties such as Obeo, etc.

We will be glad to participate to the PMF and we are willing to share
our experience of model-to-model (M2M) transformations usage for UI.

Best regards,

AtlanMod team
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383576 is a reply to message #383574] Thu, 11 December 2008 14:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi Jean-Sebastien,

Good to hear from your team. We are very interested in anyone with
experience and technology for UI modeling whishing to
contribute/participate.
You can see the PMF abstract here: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/pmf/
and Yves POC demo here: http://www.soyatec.com/eface/video/PMF.html

The spectrum for UI Models can range from purely PIM (far left) to a 1-1
mapping of a UI platform (far right).
PMF will likely be a gathering place of all parties interested in UI
Modeling, transformation and generation to specific technical UI platforms.
I expect PMF by the end of 2009 to consist of:
1) A clear PIM level metamodel and tooling to edit and transform
2) A number of metamodels and accompanying support tools to edit and
transform for different locations on the spectrum between PIM and target
platform technology
3) A number of examples of transformations to different supported UI
platforms like SWT/JFace/RCP, JSF, e4 (and maybe also Swing, ASP.Net,
GWT, Flash, XAML, etc...)

Could you give us some links to the work you have been doing concerning
UI Modeling?

Since the proposal went public we have gathered quite an impressive
group of people eager to participate which is very encouraging.
We would very much welcome participation from your team
and look forward to discussing UI modeling and transformations with the
AtlanMod team.

Regards,

Jim


> Hello,
>
> We, AtlanMod team (an INRIA-EMN team led by Jean Bézivin), are
> interested in participating to the PMF project. We have experience in
> several Eclipse projects: M2M (model-to-model transformation with
> ATL), GMT with the AM3, AMW, and Modisco components, and TMF with the
> TCS component.
>
> During his Ph.D. on Model Driven Adaptation of User Interfaces (UI)
> Jean-Sébastien experienced the usage of model-to-model transformation
> (M2M) as well as model-to-text (M2T), to generated user interfaces. He
> unified around a generic UI model code generation from abstract and
> data model to technology such as XUL, XAML, HTML and Swing.
>
> We are in relation with other interested parties such as Obeo, etc.
>
> We will be glad to participate to the PMF and we are willing to share
> our experience of model-to-model (M2M) transformations usage for UI.
>
> Best regards,
>
> AtlanMod team
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383578 is a reply to message #383576] Fri, 12 December 2008 03:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Thomas Kratz is currently offline Thomas Kratz
Messages: 163
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
HI,

I have found initial interest in what you are doing with PMF. I've been
thinking (mostly on my own) about abstraction layers in ui modeling.


Currently I'm still hand coding my UI's mostly on SWT, Ive seen Swing,
JSF, GWT, and to some extend XAML. As I far as I can see it's time to
indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface, and for that I
would be happy if I can get involved in some way, and get my hands on
the real thing.

Regards Thomas
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383580 is a reply to message #383576] Fri, 12 December 2008 04:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Thomas Schindl is currently offline Thomas Schindl
Messages: 5294
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Jim,

Could you add me:

Tom Schindl/BestSoltion.at

as an interested party to your proposal. I'd be interested in the
e4-stuff and transformation to UFaceKit-API [1] which will hopefully get
an Ecore-Model soon.

Tom

[1]http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/ufacekit/

Jim van Dam schrieb:
> Hi Jean-Sebastien,
>
> Good to hear from your team. We are very interested in anyone with
> experience and technology for UI modeling whishing to
> contribute/participate.
> You can see the PMF abstract here: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/pmf/
> and Yves POC demo here: http://www.soyatec.com/eface/video/PMF.html
>
> The spectrum for UI Models can range from purely PIM (far left) to a 1-1
> mapping of a UI platform (far right).
> PMF will likely be a gathering place of all parties interested in UI
> Modeling, transformation and generation to specific technical UI platforms.
> I expect PMF by the end of 2009 to consist of:
> 1) A clear PIM level metamodel and tooling to edit and transform
> 2) A number of metamodels and accompanying support tools to edit and
> transform for different locations on the spectrum between PIM and target
> platform technology
> 3) A number of examples of transformations to different supported UI
> platforms like SWT/JFace/RCP, JSF, e4 (and maybe also Swing, ASP.Net,
> GWT, Flash, XAML, etc...)
>
> Could you give us some links to the work you have been doing concerning
> UI Modeling?
>
> Since the proposal went public we have gathered quite an impressive
> group of people eager to participate which is very encouraging.
> We would very much welcome participation from your team
> and look forward to discussing UI modeling and transformations with the
> AtlanMod team.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We, AtlanMod team (an INRIA-EMN team led by Jean Bézivin), are
>> interested in participating to the PMF project. We have experience in
>> several Eclipse projects: M2M (model-to-model transformation with
>> ATL), GMT with the AM3, AMW, and Modisco components, and TMF with the
>> TCS component.
>>
>> During his Ph.D. on Model Driven Adaptation of User Interfaces (UI)
>> Jean-Sébastien experienced the usage of model-to-model transformation
>> (M2M) as well as model-to-text (M2T), to generated user interfaces. He
>> unified around a generic UI model code generation from abstract and
>> data model to technology such as XUL, XAML, HTML and Swing.
>>
>> We are in relation with other interested parties such as Obeo, etc.
>>
>> We will be glad to participate to the PMF and we are willing to share
>> our experience of model-to-model (M2M) transformations usage for UI.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> AtlanMod team
>>


--
B e s t S o l u t i o n . at
------------------------------------------------------------ --------
Tom Schindl JFace-Committer
------------------------------------------------------------ --------
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383582 is a reply to message #383578] Fri, 12 December 2008 20:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi Thomas,

> As I far as I can see it's time to
> indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface
We think so too. Thank you for your interest.
There will plenty of ways to participate in PMF I am sure
as it is heading to become an umbrella project for the different
possible levels of UI modeling and transformation efforts.

Regards,

Jim


Thomas wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have found initial interest in what you are doing with PMF. I've been
> thinking (mostly on my own) about abstraction layers in ui modeling.
>
>
> Currently I'm still hand coding my UI's mostly on SWT, Ive seen Swing,
> JSF, GWT, and to some extend XAML. As I far as I can see it's time to
> indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface, and for that I
> would be happy if I can get involved in some way, and get my hands on
> the real thing.
>
> Regards Thomas
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383868 is a reply to message #383580] Fri, 12 December 2008 20:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hello Tom,

UFaceKit would be a great example for PMF to target.
We'll put you on the list and look forward to discussing and
implementing UI modeling with you.

Regards,

Jim

Tom Schindl wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Could you add me:
>
> Tom Schindl/BestSoltion.at
>
> as an interested party to your proposal. I'd be interested in the
> e4-stuff and transformation to UFaceKit-API [1] which will hopefully get
> an Ecore-Model soon.
>
> Tom
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383869 is a reply to message #383578] Sun, 14 December 2008 09:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Yves YANG is currently offline Yves YANG
Messages: 687
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
For sure, a common abstraction layer is a big missing in Java. It seems it
is not a technical issue, but political one. For me, JavaFX is big joke.

Could we add you in the interested parties?

Best regards
Yves YANG
"Thomas" <thomas.kratz@eiswind.de> wrote in message
news:ght90j$9ht$1@build.eclipse.org...
> HI,
>
> I have found initial interest in what you are doing with PMF. I've been
> thinking (mostly on my own) about abstraction layers in ui modeling.
>
>
> Currently I'm still hand coding my UI's mostly on SWT, Ive seen Swing,
> JSF, GWT, and to some extend XAML. As I far as I can see it's time to
> indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface, and for that I
> would be happy if I can get involved in some way, and get my hands on the
> real thing.
>
> Regards Thomas
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383871 is a reply to message #383868] Wed, 07 January 2009 03:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Florian Lautenbacher is currently offline Florian Lautenbacher
Messages: 61
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi there,

here at the University of Augsburg we already had some students (and one
diploma thesis) working on the topic how the presentation UI can best be
modeled and how code can automatically be generated from such a PIM.

Therefore, please add me as an interested party, if you like and will be
happy to discuss some requirements and ideas concerning this topic.

Best regards,

Florian Lautenbacher
-Technology.JWT project co-lead-
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383877 is a reply to message #383871] Mon, 12 January 2009 06:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Yves YANG is currently offline Yves YANG
Messages: 687
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Florian,

Thanks. We will add you as interested party. We are very interested in your
work. Please give us more indormation.

Best regards
Yves YANG
"Florian Lautenbacher" <lautenbacher@informatik.uni-augsburg.de> wrote in
message news:95c5acfc2bd454ae1abdf32389fc19b7$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi there,
>
> here at the University of Augsburg we already had some students (and one
> diploma thesis) working on the topic how the presentation UI can best be
> modeled and how code can automatically be generated from such a PIM.
>
> Therefore, please add me as an interested party, if you like and will be
> happy to discuss some requirements and ideas concerning this topic.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Florian Lautenbacher
> -Technology.JWT project co-lead-
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383915 is a reply to message #383574] Fri, 13 February 2009 03:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
M S Indresh is currently offline M S Indresh
Messages: 4
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hello,

This is very interesting and exiting proposal. Such a common UI
abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling is
concerned.

Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Look forward
to work in this direction.

Best Regards, Indresh
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383916 is a reply to message #383574] Fri, 13 February 2009 03:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
M S Indresh is currently offline M S Indresh
Messages: 4
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hello,

This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI abstraction
was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling is concerned.

Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
forward to work in this direction.

Best Regards, Indresh
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #383917 is a reply to message #383916] Fri, 13 February 2009 06:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi Indresh,

Thx for the feedback. You're on our interested parties list.
Hope to see you at EclipseCon with the PMF session and BOF.

Regards,

Jim

M S Indresh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI
> abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling is
> concerned.
>
> Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
> forward to work in this direction.
>
> Best Regards, Indresh
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #384280 is a reply to message #383917] Sun, 12 April 2009 14:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ersin ER is currently offline Ersin ER
Messages: 34
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hello,

I am also interested in the project. Particularly I am interested in
using such a metamodel in a multimodeling environment and also a GWT port.

Would be glad if you add me to interested parties and inform on any news.

Thanks.

Jim van Dam wrote:
> Hi Indresh,
>
> Thx for the feedback. You're on our interested parties list.
> Hope to see you at EclipseCon with the PMF session and BOF.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
>
> M S Indresh wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI
>> abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling
>> is concerned.
>>
>> Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
>> forward to work in this direction.
>>
>> Best Regards, Indresh
>>

--
Ersin ER
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #384282 is a reply to message #384280] Sun, 12 April 2009 15:21 Go to previous message
Thomas Schindl is currently offline Thomas Schindl
Messages: 5294
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Ersin,

If we provide support for UFaceKit you get GWT support for free because
we (are going to) have an implementation GWT besides the one for Swing,
SWT and QT.

Future targets are:
- OpenGL via Draw3d
- Android
- (you name it)

If you want GWT support maybe you should help us making the GWT port
reality - there's currently working one guy on it. If you have question
please ask at ufk-dev@eclipse.org.

Tom

Ersin ER schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I am also interested in the project. Particularly I am interested in
> using such a metamodel in a multimodeling environment and also a GWT port.
>
> Would be glad if you add me to interested parties and inform on any news.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim van Dam wrote:
>> Hi Indresh,
>>
>> Thx for the feedback. You're on our interested parties list.
>> Hope to see you at EclipseCon with the PMF session and BOF.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> M S Indresh wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI
>>> abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling
>>> is concerned.
>>>
>>> Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
>>> forward to work in this direction.
>>>
>>> Best Regards, Indresh
>>>
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613650 is a reply to message #383574] Thu, 11 December 2008 14:39 Go to previous message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi Jean-Sebastien,

Good to hear from your team. We are very interested in anyone with
experience and technology for UI modeling whishing to
contribute/participate.
You can see the PMF abstract here: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/pmf/
and Yves POC demo here: http://www.soyatec.com/eface/video/PMF.html

The spectrum for UI Models can range from purely PIM (far left) to a 1-1
mapping of a UI platform (far right).
PMF will likely be a gathering place of all parties interested in UI
Modeling, transformation and generation to specific technical UI platforms.
I expect PMF by the end of 2009 to consist of:
1) A clear PIM level metamodel and tooling to edit and transform
2) A number of metamodels and accompanying support tools to edit and
transform for different locations on the spectrum between PIM and target
platform technology
3) A number of examples of transformations to different supported UI
platforms like SWT/JFace/RCP, JSF, e4 (and maybe also Swing, ASP.Net,
GWT, Flash, XAML, etc...)

Could you give us some links to the work you have been doing concerning
UI Modeling?

Since the proposal went public we have gathered quite an impressive
group of people eager to participate which is very encouraging.
We would very much welcome participation from your team
and look forward to discussing UI modeling and transformations with the
AtlanMod team.

Regards,

Jim


> Hello,
>
> We, AtlanMod team (an INRIA-EMN team led by Jean Bézivin), are
> interested in participating to the PMF project. We have experience in
> several Eclipse projects: M2M (model-to-model transformation with
> ATL), GMT with the AM3, AMW, and Modisco components, and TMF with the
> TCS component.
>
> During his Ph.D. on Model Driven Adaptation of User Interfaces (UI)
> Jean-Sébastien experienced the usage of model-to-model transformation
> (M2M) as well as model-to-text (M2T), to generated user interfaces. He
> unified around a generic UI model code generation from abstract and
> data model to technology such as XUL, XAML, HTML and Swing.
>
> We are in relation with other interested parties such as Obeo, etc.
>
> We will be glad to participate to the PMF and we are willing to share
> our experience of model-to-model (M2M) transformations usage for UI.
>
> Best regards,
>
> AtlanMod team
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613654 is a reply to message #383576] Fri, 12 December 2008 03:57 Go to previous message
Thomas is currently offline Thomas
Messages: 151
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
HI,

I have found initial interest in what you are doing with PMF. I've been
thinking (mostly on my own) about abstraction layers in ui modeling.


Currently I'm still hand coding my UI's mostly on SWT, Ive seen Swing,
JSF, GWT, and to some extend XAML. As I far as I can see it's time to
indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface, and for that I
would be happy if I can get involved in some way, and get my hands on
the real thing.

Regards Thomas
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613657 is a reply to message #383576] Fri, 12 December 2008 04:02 Go to previous message
Thomas Schindl is currently offline Thomas Schindl
Messages: 5294
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Jim,

Could you add me:

Tom Schindl/BestSoltion.at

as an interested party to your proposal. I'd be interested in the
e4-stuff and transformation to UFaceKit-API [1] which will hopefully get
an Ecore-Model soon.

Tom

[1]http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/ufacekit/

Jim van Dam schrieb:
> Hi Jean-Sebastien,
>
> Good to hear from your team. We are very interested in anyone with
> experience and technology for UI modeling whishing to
> contribute/participate.
> You can see the PMF abstract here: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/pmf/
> and Yves POC demo here: http://www.soyatec.com/eface/video/PMF.html
>
> The spectrum for UI Models can range from purely PIM (far left) to a 1-1
> mapping of a UI platform (far right).
> PMF will likely be a gathering place of all parties interested in UI
> Modeling, transformation and generation to specific technical UI platforms.
> I expect PMF by the end of 2009 to consist of:
> 1) A clear PIM level metamodel and tooling to edit and transform
> 2) A number of metamodels and accompanying support tools to edit and
> transform for different locations on the spectrum between PIM and target
> platform technology
> 3) A number of examples of transformations to different supported UI
> platforms like SWT/JFace/RCP, JSF, e4 (and maybe also Swing, ASP.Net,
> GWT, Flash, XAML, etc...)
>
> Could you give us some links to the work you have been doing concerning
> UI Modeling?
>
> Since the proposal went public we have gathered quite an impressive
> group of people eager to participate which is very encouraging.
> We would very much welcome participation from your team
> and look forward to discussing UI modeling and transformations with the
> AtlanMod team.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We, AtlanMod team (an INRIA-EMN team led by Jean Bézivin), are
>> interested in participating to the PMF project. We have experience in
>> several Eclipse projects: M2M (model-to-model transformation with
>> ATL), GMT with the AM3, AMW, and Modisco components, and TMF with the
>> TCS component.
>>
>> During his Ph.D. on Model Driven Adaptation of User Interfaces (UI)
>> Jean-Sébastien experienced the usage of model-to-model transformation
>> (M2M) as well as model-to-text (M2T), to generated user interfaces. He
>> unified around a generic UI model code generation from abstract and
>> data model to technology such as XUL, XAML, HTML and Swing.
>>
>> We are in relation with other interested parties such as Obeo, etc.
>>
>> We will be glad to participate to the PMF and we are willing to share
>> our experience of model-to-model (M2M) transformations usage for UI.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> AtlanMod team
>>


--
B e s t S o l u t i o n . at
------------------------------------------------------------ --------
Tom Schindl JFace-Committer
------------------------------------------------------------ --------
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613660 is a reply to message #383578] Fri, 12 December 2008 20:47 Go to previous message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi Thomas,

> As I far as I can see it's time to
> indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface
We think so too. Thank you for your interest.
There will plenty of ways to participate in PMF I am sure
as it is heading to become an umbrella project for the different
possible levels of UI modeling and transformation efforts.

Regards,

Jim


Thomas wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have found initial interest in what you are doing with PMF. I've been
> thinking (mostly on my own) about abstraction layers in ui modeling.
>
>
> Currently I'm still hand coding my UI's mostly on SWT, Ive seen Swing,
> JSF, GWT, and to some extend XAML. As I far as I can see it's time to
> indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface, and for that I
> would be happy if I can get involved in some way, and get my hands on
> the real thing.
>
> Regards Thomas
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613803 is a reply to message #383580] Fri, 12 December 2008 20:51 Go to previous message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hello Tom,

UFaceKit would be a great example for PMF to target.
We'll put you on the list and look forward to discussing and
implementing UI modeling with you.

Regards,

Jim

Tom Schindl wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Could you add me:
>
> Tom Schindl/BestSoltion.at
>
> as an interested party to your proposal. I'd be interested in the
> e4-stuff and transformation to UFaceKit-API [1] which will hopefully get
> an Ecore-Model soon.
>
> Tom
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613804 is a reply to message #383578] Sun, 14 December 2008 09:29 Go to previous message
Yves YANG is currently offline Yves YANG
Messages: 687
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
For sure, a common abstraction layer is a big missing in Java. It seems it
is not a technical issue, but political one. For me, JavaFX is big joke.

Could we add you in the interested parties?

Best regards
Yves YANG
"Thomas" <thomas.kratz@eiswind.de> wrote in message
news:ght90j$9ht$1@build.eclipse.org...
> HI,
>
> I have found initial interest in what you are doing with PMF. I've been
> thinking (mostly on my own) about abstraction layers in ui modeling.
>
>
> Currently I'm still hand coding my UI's mostly on SWT, Ive seen Swing,
> JSF, GWT, and to some extend XAML. As I far as I can see it's time to
> indroduce a common abstraction layer for user interface, and for that I
> would be happy if I can get involved in some way, and get my hands on the
> real thing.
>
> Regards Thomas
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613810 is a reply to message #383868] Wed, 07 January 2009 03:34 Go to previous message
Florian Lautenbacher is currently offline Florian Lautenbacher
Messages: 61
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi there,

here at the University of Augsburg we already had some students (and one
diploma thesis) working on the topic how the presentation UI can best be
modeled and how code can automatically be generated from such a PIM.

Therefore, please add me as an interested party, if you like and will be
happy to discuss some requirements and ideas concerning this topic.

Best regards,

Florian Lautenbacher
-Technology.JWT project co-lead-
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #613826 is a reply to message #383871] Mon, 12 January 2009 06:50 Go to previous message
Yves YANG is currently offline Yves YANG
Messages: 687
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Florian,

Thanks. We will add you as interested party. We are very interested in your
work. Please give us more indormation.

Best regards
Yves YANG
"Florian Lautenbacher" <lautenbacher@informatik.uni-augsburg.de> wrote in
message news:95c5acfc2bd454ae1abdf32389fc19b7$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi there,
>
> here at the University of Augsburg we already had some students (and one
> diploma thesis) working on the topic how the presentation UI can best be
> modeled and how code can automatically be generated from such a PIM.
>
> Therefore, please add me as an interested party, if you like and will be
> happy to discuss some requirements and ideas concerning this topic.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Florian Lautenbacher
> -Technology.JWT project co-lead-
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #614932 is a reply to message #383574] Fri, 13 February 2009 03:10 Go to previous message
M S Indresh is currently offline M S Indresh
Messages: 4
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hello,

This is very interesting and exiting proposal. Such a common UI
abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling is
concerned.

Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Look forward
to work in this direction.

Best Regards, Indresh
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #614934 is a reply to message #383574] Fri, 13 February 2009 03:15 Go to previous message
M S Indresh is currently offline M S Indresh
Messages: 4
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hello,

This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI abstraction
was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling is concerned.

Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
forward to work in this direction.

Best Regards, Indresh
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #614936 is a reply to message #383916] Fri, 13 February 2009 06:31 Go to previous message
Jim Van Dam is currently offline Jim Van Dam
Messages: 38
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi Indresh,

Thx for the feedback. You're on our interested parties list.
Hope to see you at EclipseCon with the PMF session and BOF.

Regards,

Jim

M S Indresh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI
> abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling is
> concerned.
>
> Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
> forward to work in this direction.
>
> Best Regards, Indresh
>
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #615317 is a reply to message #383917] Sun, 12 April 2009 14:38 Go to previous message
Ersin ER is currently offline Ersin ER
Messages: 34
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hello,

I am also interested in the project. Particularly I am interested in
using such a metamodel in a multimodeling environment and also a GWT port.

Would be glad if you add me to interested parties and inform on any news.

Thanks.

Jim van Dam wrote:
> Hi Indresh,
>
> Thx for the feedback. You're on our interested parties list.
> Hope to see you at EclipseCon with the PMF session and BOF.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
>
> M S Indresh wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI
>> abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling
>> is concerned.
>>
>> Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
>> forward to work in this direction.
>>
>> Best Regards, Indresh
>>

--
Ersin ER
Re: [PMF] Feedback about the PMF project [message #615320 is a reply to message #384280] Sun, 12 April 2009 15:21 Go to previous message
Thomas Schindl is currently offline Thomas Schindl
Messages: 5294
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Ersin,

If we provide support for UFaceKit you get GWT support for free because
we (are going to) have an implementation GWT besides the one for Swing,
SWT and QT.

Future targets are:
- OpenGL via Draw3d
- Android
- (you name it)

If you want GWT support maybe you should help us making the GWT port
reality - there's currently working one guy on it. If you have question
please ask at ufk-dev@eclipse.org.

Tom

Ersin ER schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I am also interested in the project. Particularly I am interested in
> using such a metamodel in a multimodeling environment and also a GWT port.
>
> Would be glad if you add me to interested parties and inform on any news.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim van Dam wrote:
>> Hi Indresh,
>>
>> Thx for the feedback. You're on our interested parties list.
>> Hope to see you at EclipseCon with the PMF session and BOF.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> M S Indresh wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This is a very interesting and exciting proposal. A common UI
>>> abstraction was always missing as far as the UI programming/modeling
>>> is concerned.
>>>
>>> Can you please include me in the list of interested parties? Looking
>>> forward to work in this direction.
>>>
>>> Best Regards, Indresh
>>>
>
Previous Topic:[PMF] Business modeling
Next Topic:palette using patterns
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Aug 29 06:31:01 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02683 seconds